| Risk factor | Finding | Evidence | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sellable | No — transfers blocked | ChainSift simulation | 26 Oct 2026 |
| Buy tax | 0% | Contract | 26 Oct 2026 |
| Sell tax | No data | Contract | 26 Oct 2026 |
| Admin mint | Not found | Implementation code | 26 Oct 2026 |
| Transfers pausable | Not found | Implementation code | 26 Oct 2026 |
| Address blacklist | Enabled | Implementation code | 26 Oct 2026 |
| Upgradeable proxy | Yes — a single wallet can replace the code | Proxy contract | 26 Oct 2026 |
| Source verified | Yes | Block explorer | 26 Oct 2026 |
| Top-10 holders | 100% | Holder distribution | 26 Oct 2026 |
| Liquidity locked | No | LP holders | 26 Oct 2026 |
| Holders | 52665 | Token contract | 26 Oct 2026 |
| Deployed by | 0x35b653…3b62dc |
| Code can be replaced by | 0xed8e51…94ecbf — a single wallet |
| Current code | 0x562461…6269a3 |
| Holders | 52,665 |
| Rank | Address | Share |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | 0x5d2a6a…23d05f | 100.00% |
| #2 · burned | 0x000000…00dead | 0.00% |
| #3 | 0x69be27…6d3a20 | 0.00% |
| #4 | 0x804735…298375 | 0.00% |
| #5 | 0xde0fc4…6583a0 | 0.00% |
This check scored 0 out of 18, and the findings point to a contract where the owner holds extensive control over what happens to a holder's tokens. The most significant finding is that selling is blocked by the contract — this is a honeypot characteristic, meaning tokens can be bought but not sold. In practice, this means money put into the token stays there, with no exit route detected at the time of this check. Beyond that, the contract supports blacklisting, which would let the owner (or whoever controls the admin wallet) prevent specific addresses from transacting at all. It's also built on an upgradeable proxy, which means a single wallet has the power to swap out the entire contract logic at any time — including removing or changing any of the mechanics listed here, for better or worse. Liquidity is not locked, so whoever supplies the trading pool could withdraw it, and the top 10 holders currently hold 100% of supply, indicating extremely concentrated ownership rather than broad distribution.
It's worth being clear about what this check does not cover. This is an automated read of the contract's mechanics only — it looks at what the code technically allows, not at who is behind the project, what they intend to do, or whether any of these powers will be exercised. It says nothing about the team's identity or track record, the token's economic design, marketing claims, roadmap, or any legal or regulatory status. Source code being verified on the explorer (which it is here) means the code is readable, not that it has been independently audited or judged sound by a human reviewer — no human review took place as part of this check.
Given selling is currently blocked, this is not a situation where a small test purchase would tell you anything useful — funds placed into a token that cannot be sold remain there regardless of amount. Readers wanting to understand this contract further would do better to review the verified source code directly for the functions controlling transfers and blacklisting, check the proxy admin address to see who holds upgrade rights, look at the liquidity pool and its lock status on a block explorer, and search independently for any audit reports, team disclosures, or community discussion referencing this specific contract address before forming a view.
Contracts change after they are checked. Tell us where to reach you and we will say when this one does. Free for three contracts, no account.
We checked 18 points out of 100.
The other 82 are where money is usually lost: who the team is, where the tokens sit, what the documents actually say, and what the project chose not to put on its front page.