| Risk factor | Finding | Evidence | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sellable | Yes | Transfer simulation | 26 Oct 2026 |
| Buy tax | 0% | Contract | 26 Oct 2026 |
| Sell tax | 0% | Contract | 26 Oct 2026 |
| Admin mint | Not present | Contract | 26 Oct 2026 |
| Transfers pausable | Not present | Contract | 26 Oct 2026 |
| Address blacklist | Not present | Contract | 26 Oct 2026 |
| Upgradeable proxy | No | Contract | 26 Oct 2026 |
| Source verified | Yes | Block explorer | 26 Oct 2026 |
| Top-10 holders | 59.1% | Holder distribution | 26 Oct 2026 |
| Liquidity locked | No | LP holders | 26 Oct 2026 |
| Holders | 80131 | Token contract | 26 Oct 2026 |
| Deployed by | 0xc100a3…b2b247 |
| Current owner | None — ownership renounced |
| Holders | 80,131 |
| Rank | Address | Share |
|---|---|---|
| #1 · PancakeV3 · contract | 0xbd7fbd…5e526f | 22.44% |
| #2 · PancakeV2 · contract | 0x7500e0…cdc4e1 | 20.90% |
| #3 | 0x0d0707…b492fe | 7.16% |
| #4 · burned | 0x000000…00dead | 3.59% |
| #5 | 0x45f220…73a2b8 | 1.19% |
This automated check of BabyNeiro's contract on BSC scored 14 out of 18, and the individual findings are worth unpacking rather than treating as a single pass/fail grade. The simulation found the token sellable, with no buy or sell tax detected, which means that on the date of the check a transfer and sale went through without being blocked or taxed. No admin mint function was detected, meaning the contract owner cannot be seen to create new tokens out of thin air and dilute holders. No pause function was detected, so transfers cannot currently be frozen by the owner. No blacklist function was detected, meaning there's no visible mechanism to block specific wallets from trading. The contract is not upgradeable, so its logic cannot be swapped out later by whoever controls it. Two points do stand out: liquidity is not locked, which means whoever supplied the trading pool could withdraw it, reducing or removing the ability to sell at a fair price; and the top 10 wallets hold 59.1% of supply, a concentration level where large sales by a few holders could move the price significantly for everyone else.
It's worth being clear about what this check does not do. It reads the contract's code and current on-chain state — what functions exist, how a test transfer behaves, how tokens are distributed across wallets. It does not assess who is behind the project, whether any team claims are accurate, how the token's economics are designed to play out over time, whether there's a legal entity behind it, or what the people controlling the liquidity or large wallets intend to do. A clean set of contract mechanics says nothing about those things, and no human has reviewed this token or vouched for it — the check is fully automated.
Before putting any money toward this token, it's worth looking at where the liquidity pool tokens are held and whether they sit in a wallet with no lock or vesting, since that directly affects how easily the pool could be drained. It's also worth looking at the identity and history of the top holder wallets — whether they're exchange addresses, team wallets, or unrelated individuals — and checking whether the project has any public team information, audits beyond this automated check, or a track record elsewhere. None of this amounts to a recommendation to buy or sell, and this summary is not investment advice.
Contracts change after they are checked. Tell us where to reach you and we will say when this one does. Free for three contracts, no account.
We checked 18 points out of 100.
The other 82 are where money is usually lost: who the team is, where the tokens sit, what the documents actually say, and what the project chose not to put on its front page.