Before you buy: Liquidity is not locked. Who can pull it out, how much real money is in the pool, and what do you lose selling $1,000?
| Risk factor | Finding | Evidence | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sellable | Yes | Transfer simulation | 4 Nov 2026 |
| Buy tax | 0% | Contract | 4 Nov 2026 |
| Sell tax | 0% | Contract | 4 Nov 2026 |
| Admin mint | Not present | Contract | 4 Nov 2026 |
| Transfers pausable | Not present | Contract | 4 Nov 2026 |
| Address blacklist | Not present | Contract | 4 Nov 2026 |
| Upgradeable proxy | No | Contract | 4 Nov 2026 |
| Source verified | Yes | Block explorer | 4 Nov 2026 |
| Top-10 holders | 100% | Holder distribution | 4 Nov 2026 |
| Liquidity locked | No | LP holders | 4 Nov 2026 |
| Holders | 10 | Token contract | 4 Nov 2026 |
| Deployed by | 0xbf3b1c…00d9f6 |
| Holders | 10 |
| Rank | Address | Share |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | 0xbf3b1c…00d9f6 | 91.79% |
| #2 | 0x6d45d7…7c705e | 2.08% |
| #3 | 0x3a62b8…815b8e | 1.65% |
| #4 | 0xf312fc…03b44c | 1.44% |
| #5 | 0x2be707…c5b539 | 1.26% |
This automated check looked at the contract code and on-chain data for 百年币安 on BSC and scored it 12 out of 18. A test transfer indicates the token can currently be bought and sold, with no buy or sell tax detected and no honeypot behaviour found on the date of this check. The contract does not appear to contain an admin minting function, a transfer-pause switch, an address blacklist, or an upgradeable proxy pattern, meaning that — as written — the owner does not currently retain those specific levers over holders' tokens. The source code is verified on the block explorer, which allows this kind of automated reading in the first place. Set against that, two findings stand out: liquidity is not locked, which means whoever controls the liquidity pool could withdraw it at any time, and the top 10 holders control 100% of the supply across only 10 holders total — an extremely concentrated distribution where a small number of wallets, potentially including the project team, could move a large portion of supply at once.
It's important to be clear about what this check does not cover. It reads contract mechanics and on-chain positions only — it has no view into who the team behind this token is, whether they are reachable or accountable, how tokenomics are supposed to unfold over time, what legal entity (if any) stands behind the project, or what the stated intent of the project is. No human has reviewed this token or its promotional material, and a clean mechanical read says nothing about whether the people behind it will act in holders' interests.
Before putting money into this token, it would be worth looking at where the liquidity pool tokens currently sit and who holds them, since unlocked liquidity sitting with a single wallet is a materially different situation to unlocked liquidity split across several known addresses. It's also worth examining the wallets within that top-10 list directly on the block explorer to see whether they look like a team/treasury allocation, an exchange, or unrelated individual holders, and watching whether that concentration changes over time. Searching for the project's social channels, any team identification, and independent community discussion would add context this check cannot provide. Finally, because conditions like liquidity locks and holder concentration can change at any time, treat this result as a snapshot for the date shown rather than a standing guarantee.
Contracts change after they are checked. Tell us where to reach you and we will say when this one does. Free for three contracts, no account.
We checked 18 points out of 100.
The other 82 are where money is usually lost: who the team is, where the tokens sit, what the documents actually say, and what the project chose not to put on its front page.
Trading a meme coin? The meme coin check shows how much real money is in the pool and what you lose selling $1,000, who can pull that money out, who holds the supply and how it trades — ready within 3 minutes of payment, day or night.