| Risk factor | Finding | Evidence | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sellable | Yes | Transfer simulation | 25 Oct 2026 |
| Buy tax | 0% | Contract | 25 Oct 2026 |
| Sell tax | No data | Contract | 25 Oct 2026 |
| Admin mint | Not present | Contract | 25 Oct 2026 |
| Transfers pausable | Enabled | Contract | 25 Oct 2026 |
| Address blacklist | Not present | Contract | 25 Oct 2026 |
| Upgradeable proxy | No | Contract | 25 Oct 2026 |
| Source verified | Yes | Block explorer | 25 Oct 2026 |
| Top-10 holders | 9.4% | Holder distribution | 25 Oct 2026 |
| Liquidity locked | No | LP holders | 25 Oct 2026 |
| Holders | 271 | Token contract | 25 Oct 2026 |
| Deployed by | 0x733104…7c2fe3 |
| Current owner | 0x733104…7c2fe3 |
| Holders | 271 |
| Rank | Address | Share |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | 0x9da809…b2d552 | 1.55% |
| #2 | 0x993ad6…ffdcd1 | 1.44% |
| #3 | 0xaa9b49…4b5782 | 1.04% |
| #4 | 0x82ea6f…7f4f4f | 0.97% |
| #5 | 0xfd7bd6…89a6a5 | 0.83% |
This automated check looked at the contract code behind TGB (THE GEM BULL) on BSC and found a score of 17 out of 18, which reflects the mechanics the check is able to read on-chain, not a judgement on the project as a whole. A sell simulation completed successfully on the date of the check, and no admin mint function, blacklist function or upgradeable proxy pattern was detected, meaning the owner does not currently appear able to create new tokens out of thin air, block specific wallets from trading, or silently swap in new contract logic. The contract source code is also verified on the block explorer, so anyone can read the actual deployed logic rather than taking it on trust.
That said, two findings are worth sitting with. Transfers can be paused by the owner: this means a single admin-controlled switch could stop some or all token movement, including yours, at any time, for any reason, without needing your consent. Liquidity is not locked: the tokens that make up the trading pool can be withdrawn by whoever controls them, which, in a worst case, can remove the ability to trade at a reasonable price. Holder concentration here is relatively low, with the top 10 wallets holding 9.4% of supply across 271 holders, which on its own does not suggest a single wallet could easily dump a dominant share — though it says nothing about who those wallets belong to or whether they're linked.
None of this tells you who is behind the project, what they intend to do with the pause function or the unlocked liquidity, whether the tokenomics make long-term sense, or whether any legal or regulatory structure sits behind the token. This check only reads contract mechanics as they exist today; it does not assess the team, their track record, marketing claims, or intent, and it cannot predict future behaviour, including whether the owner will use the pause function or move liquidity later.
Before putting money in, it's worth looking at who holds the contract's owner/admin keys and whether that's a multisig or a single wallet, checking the liquidity pool directly on-chain to see who holds the LP tokens and whether a lock exists anywhere outside this check, searching for the team's public identity and history, reading any audit reports if they exist, and reviewing the project's own documentation for what the pause function is meant to be used for. Try to confirm these details from more than one independent source rather than relying on the project's own messaging alone.
Contracts change after they are checked. Tell us where to reach you and we will say when this one does. Free for three contracts, no account.
We checked 18 points out of 100.
The other 82 are where money is usually lost: who the team is, where the tokens sit, what the documents actually say, and what the project chose not to put on its front page.