Before you buy: Liquidity is not locked. Who can pull it out, how much real money is in the pool, and what do you lose selling $1,000?
| Risk factor | Finding | Evidence | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sellable | Yes | Transfer simulation | 3 Nov 2026 |
| Buy tax | 0% | Contract | 3 Nov 2026 |
| Sell tax | 0% | Contract | 3 Nov 2026 |
| Admin mint | Not present | Contract | 3 Nov 2026 |
| Transfers pausable | Enabled | Contract | 3 Nov 2026 |
| Address blacklist | Enabled | Contract | 3 Nov 2026 |
| Upgradeable proxy | No | Contract | 3 Nov 2026 |
| Source verified | Yes | Block explorer | 3 Nov 2026 |
| Top-10 holders | 78.3% | Holder distribution | 3 Nov 2026 |
| Liquidity locked | No | LP holders | 3 Nov 2026 |
| Holders | 6547 | Token contract | 3 Nov 2026 |
| Deployed by | 0x3d3efc…3a04ba |
| Current owner | 0x3d3efc…3a04ba |
| Holders | 6,547 |
| Rank | Address | Share |
|---|---|---|
| #1 · contract | 0x080b00…489377 | 34.36% |
| #2 · PancakeV2 · contract | 0x7d40cf…b13bd6 | 21.40% |
| #3 | 0x3d3efc…3a04ba | 7.45% |
| #4 · contract | 0x5da0cf…da3d8e | 4.31% |
| #5 | 0x47181f…2fb856 | 3.99% |
This automated check scored ILA (InfiniteLaunch) 11 out of 18 on BscScan, and a few of the findings are worth understanding in plain terms. The contract allows the owner to pause transfers for all holders, meaning token movement could be halted at the owner's discretion. It also supports blacklisting, which lets the owner block specific wallet addresses from transacting with the token at all. Neither of these was triggered at the time of the check — the token simulated as sellable, with 0% buy and sell tax, and no honeypot behaviour was detected — but the underlying capability exists in the code and could be activated later. Separately, liquidity is not locked, which means whoever controls the liquidity pool could withdraw it, and the top 10 holders control 78.3% of the supply, a concentration level that means a small number of wallets could move the market significantly if they sold. The source code is verified, so this check could read actual contract logic rather than guessing from bytecode.
What this check cannot tell you is just as important. It only reads contract mechanics as they exist on-chain today — it says nothing about who is behind the project, whether the team has a track record, how the tokenomics are structured long-term, whether there's a registered legal entity, or what the stated intentions are for using owner privileges like pausing or blacklisting. A contract can look mechanically clean and still be attached to a team that behaves badly, and conversely, some legitimate projects retain admin functions like these for genuine operational reasons such as responding to exploits. This check has no way of distinguishing between those cases.
Before putting any money in, it's worth looking at who holds the top wallets and whether any are known exchange or team addresses, checking whether the liquidity pool tokens are held by a burn address or a multisig rather than a single private wallet, and searching for any public communication from the team about why pause and blacklist functions exist and under what circumstances they'd be used. It's also worth re-running a check like this closer to the time of any transaction, since contract permissions and liquidity status can change. None of this replaces independent research into the people and structure behind the project, which sits outside what a contract scanner can ever see.
Contracts change after they are checked. Tell us where to reach you and we will say when this one does. Free for three contracts, no account.
We checked 18 points out of 100.
The other 82 are where money is usually lost: who the team is, where the tokens sit, what the documents actually say, and what the project chose not to put on its front page.
Trading a meme coin? The meme coin check shows how much real money is in the pool and what you lose selling $1,000, who can pull that money out, who holds the supply and how it trades — ready within 3 minutes of payment, day or night.