| Risk factor | Finding | Evidence | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sellable | No data | Transfer simulation | 7 Oct 2026 |
| Buy tax | 0% | Contract | 7 Oct 2026 |
| Sell tax | 0% | Contract | 7 Oct 2026 |
| Admin mint | No data | Contract | 7 Oct 2026 |
| Transfers pausable | No data | Contract | 7 Oct 2026 |
| Address blacklist | No data | Contract | 7 Oct 2026 |
| Upgradeable proxy | No data | Contract | 7 Oct 2026 |
| Source verified | No | Block explorer | 7 Oct 2026 |
| Top-10 holders | 97.9% | Holder distribution | 7 Oct 2026 |
| Liquidity locked | No | LP holders | 7 Oct 2026 |
| Holders | 20 | Token contract | 7 Oct 2026 |
| Deployed by | 0x452b36…0fe1cf |
| Holders | 20 |
| Rank | Address | Share |
|---|---|---|
| #1 · contract | 0x452b36…0fe1cf | 23.72% |
| #2 | 0x0de8f9…9a81fa | 16.46% |
| #3 | 0x192f72…ab9d72 | 16.37% |
| #4 | 0x873261…b59f88 | 13.72% |
| #5 | 0xc1da9f…3fd674 | 7.01% |
This automated check could not confirm several basic contract mechanics for DSMBXSOL because the source code is not verified on the block explorer — the data available comes only from the raw bytecode, which limits how much can be read automatically. Where data is missing, that means it was not retrievable on the date of the check, not that the function is absent. The findings that could be confirmed point to concentrated control: the top 10 wallets hold 97.9% of the supply, and with only 20 total holders recorded, a very small number of addresses could move a large share of the token at once, which can affect price sharply in either direction. Liquidity is not locked, meaning whoever supplied the trading pool retains the ability to withdraw it at any time, which would make the token difficult or impossible to sell. Because sellability, admin mint, pause, blacklist and upgradeability functions were not reported, this check cannot say whether the contract owner can block sales, mint new tokens that dilute holders, freeze specific wallets, or change the contract's behaviour after launch — these remain unknown rather than ruled out.
It is worth being clear about what this check does not cover. It only reads contract mechanics as they appear on-chain on the date of the check. It says nothing about who the team behind DSMBXSOL is, whether they have a track record, what the token is meant to be used for, how its supply and distribution were designed, or whether any marketing claims made about it are accurate. None of that falls within the scope of an automated contract scan, and no human has reviewed this token as part of this process.
Before considering any transaction, it would be reasonable to look for the contract's verified source code directly on a block explorer such as BscScan, since unverified source is itself a limitation on what can be checked. It is also worth examining the liquidity pool directly to see whether a lock exists outside of what this tool detected, checking the holder list to see whether the top wallets are linked to exchanges or known project addresses rather than individuals, and searching independently for any public information about the team or project behind the token. Running a small test transaction before committing larger amounts can also reveal sell restrictions that automated tools sometimes miss.
Contracts change after they are checked. Tell us where to reach you and we will say when this one does. Free for three contracts, no account.
We checked 10 points out of 100.
The other 90 are where money is usually lost: who the team is, where the tokens sit, what the documents actually say, and what the project chose not to put on its front page.