| Risk factor | Finding | Evidence | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sellable | Yes | Transfer simulation | 26 Oct 2026 |
| Buy tax | 5% | Contract | 26 Oct 2026 |
| Sell tax | 5% | Contract | 26 Oct 2026 |
| Admin mint | Not present | Contract | 26 Oct 2026 |
| Transfers pausable | Not present | Contract | 26 Oct 2026 |
| Address blacklist | Not present | Contract | 26 Oct 2026 |
| Upgradeable proxy | No | Contract | 26 Oct 2026 |
| Source verified | Yes | Block explorer | 26 Oct 2026 |
| Top-10 holders | 95.9% | Holder distribution | 26 Oct 2026 |
| Liquidity locked | 77.2% burned | LP holders | 26 Oct 2026 |
| Holders | 78769 | Token contract | 26 Oct 2026 |
| Deployed by | 0x6c9d80…0be5c1 |
| Current owner | 0x000000…00dead |
| Holders | 78,769 |
| Rank | Address | Share |
|---|---|---|
| #1 · contract | 0x4e8277…fc03d2 | 71.15% |
| #2 · burned | 0x000000…00dead | 16.79% |
| #3 · PancakeV2 · contract | 0x2955e3…5955b2 | 4.32% |
| #4 · contract | 0x58e272…3ea229 | 1.81% |
| #5 · contract | 0x812bd8…d1e02b | 0.61% |
This automated check of Napoleon Token V2 (NPL) on BSC found no honeypot behaviour at the time of the scan — the transfer simulation showed the token can be bought and sold. A transfer tax of up to 5% applies on both buys and sells, meaning a portion of every trade is deducted automatically by the contract rather than going to you or the counterparty; this is a built-in cost of trading, not a sign of inability to sell. No admin mint function, no pause function, no blacklist capability and no upgradeable proxy were detected, which means that, as the contract is currently written, the owner does not appear to have the ability to create new tokens out of thin air, freeze transfers, block specific wallets, or swap in different contract logic later. The contract source is verified on the block explorer, so the code that was checked is the same code that is publicly readable. Liquidity is reported as 77.2% burned, which reduces (but does not eliminate) the risk of that portion of liquidity being pulled. Against this, the top 10 holders control 95.9% of total supply — a very high concentration that means a small number of wallets could sell large amounts at once, which can affect price independently of anything the contract code does.
What this check does not tell you is just as important. It only reads contract mechanics as they exist on-chain today; it says nothing about who is behind the project, whether the team has a track record, how tokens were allocated or vested, whether there are off-chain promises or agreements, or whether the stated intentions match the code's behaviour over time. A contract can look mechanically unrestricted today and still be changed, redeployed, or abandoned. Absence of a flag means that specific behaviour was not detected on the date of this check — it is not a certification that the token is safe, legitimate, or free of risk.
Before putting any money toward this token, it would be reasonable to look at who the top holders actually are and whether their wallets show patterns of coordinated selling, to check whether the liquidity lock or burn can be independently verified on a block explorer or lock-checking service, to search for the project's social channels and any public team information, and to read the contract's tax and fee functions yourself or via a trusted explorer to confirm the 5% figures apply uniformly and aren't adjustable by the owner. None of this constitutes investment advice, and nothing here should be read as a recommendation to buy, hold, or avoid the token.
Contracts change after they are checked. Tell us where to reach you and we will say when this one does. Free for three contracts, no account.
We checked 18 points out of 100.
The other 82 are where money is usually lost: who the team is, where the tokens sit, what the documents actually say, and what the project chose not to put on its front page.