Before you buy: Liquidity is not locked. Who can pull it out, how much real money is in the pool, and what do you lose selling $1,000?
| Risk factor | Finding | Evidence | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sellable | No data | Transfer simulation | 3 Nov 2026 |
| Buy tax | No data | Contract | 3 Nov 2026 |
| Sell tax | No data | Contract | 3 Nov 2026 |
| Admin mint | Not present | Contract | 3 Nov 2026 |
| Transfers pausable | Not present | Contract | 3 Nov 2026 |
| Address blacklist | Not present | Contract | 3 Nov 2026 |
| Upgradeable proxy | No | Contract | 3 Nov 2026 |
| Source verified | Yes | Block explorer | 3 Nov 2026 |
| Top-10 holders | 66.6% | Holder distribution | 3 Nov 2026 |
| Liquidity locked | No | LP holders | 3 Nov 2026 |
| Holders | 20128 | Token contract | 3 Nov 2026 |
| Deployed by | 0x913539…2d4b4d |
| Current owner | 0x66bedb…70a325 |
| Holders | 20,128 |
| Rank | Address | Share |
|---|---|---|
| #1 · contract | 0x66bedb…70a325 | 32.84% |
| #2 · burned | 0x000000…00dead | 19.84% |
| #3 | 0x8a430a…1e1f4c | 2.55% |
| #4 | 0x83bc5d…648865 | 2.05% |
| #5 | 0x75987b…0927a4 | 2.03% |
This automated check looked at the MEMES contract on BNB Smart Chain and found a mix of reassuring and unresolved points. The contract's source code is verified on the block explorer, meaning the published code can be read and matches what's deployed, and no minting function, transfer pausing, or address blacklisting capability was detected in that code as of the check date. That means, based on what was found, the owner does not currently appear able to create new tokens out of thin air, freeze transfers network-wide, or block specific wallets from moving their holdings. However, whether the token can actually be sold on the open market was not confirmed — the sellability simulation returned no data, as did the buy and sell tax figures. That gap matters: it means this check cannot tell you whether a sale would succeed or what cut, if any, would be taken on a trade. Separately, top-10 wallets hold 66.6% of the supply, which is a concentrated distribution — a small number of holders could move the market significantly if they sold, and liquidity is not locked, meaning whoever supplied the trading pool could withdraw it at any time, which would affect the ability to trade the token at a stable price.
It's worth being clear about what this check does not cover. It reads contract mechanics only — things that can be verified from code and on-chain data. It says nothing about who the team behind MEMES is, whether they have a track record, how tokens are allocated or vested, whether there's a legal entity behind the project, or what the stated intentions are. A clean read on contract mechanics does not speak to any of that, and a concentrated or unlocked-liquidity setup does not by itself indicate intent either way.
Given the missing sellability data, no test transaction of any size is a reliable way to resolve the question, since even a successful buy tells you nothing about whether a later sale would work. Instead, check whether the liquidity pool is locked using a separate LP lock lookup tool for the same contract address, look at the top-10 holder wallets individually on the block explorer to see if they're exchange addresses or dormant wallets, and search independently for any information about the team, social channels, and project history outside of this contract check. Treat any findings here as one input among several, not a conclusion.
Contracts change after they are checked. Tell us where to reach you and we will say when this one does. Free for three contracts, no account.
We checked 10 points out of 100.
The other 90 are where money is usually lost: who the team is, where the tokens sit, what the documents actually say, and what the project chose not to put on its front page.
Trading a meme coin? The meme coin check shows how much real money is in the pool and what you lose selling $1,000, who can pull that money out, who holds the supply and how it trades — ready within 3 minutes of payment, day or night.