| Risk factor | Finding | Evidence | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sellable | Yes | Transfer simulation | 9 Sept 2026 |
| Buy tax | 0% | Contract | 9 Sept 2026 |
| Sell tax | 0% | Contract | 9 Sept 2026 |
| Admin mint | Not present | Contract | 9 Sept 2026 |
| Transfers pausable | Not present | Contract | 9 Sept 2026 |
| Address blacklist | Not present | Contract | 9 Sept 2026 |
| Upgradeable proxy | Yes | Contract | 9 Sept 2026 |
| Source verified | Yes | Block explorer | 9 Sept 2026 |
| Top-10 holders | 98.5% | Holder distribution | 9 Sept 2026 |
| Liquidity locked | No | LP holders | 9 Sept 2026 |
| Holders | 1978 | Token contract | 9 Sept 2026 |
| Deployed by | 0x64fdaf…178d53 |
| Holders | 1,978 |
| Rank | Address | Share |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | 0xe2fc31…a93ae1 | 56.32% |
| #2 | 0x8894e0…e2d4e3 | 22.73% |
| #3 | 0x084399…434083 | 16.26% |
| #4 | 0x56a783…3d82c0 | 0.75% |
| #5 | 0xe2588c…dc0e13 | 0.70% |
This automated check on SNDKB (BSC) scored 11 out of 18, and each finding describes a specific technical capability rather than an overall judgement on the token. The contract uses an upgradeable proxy pattern, which means the underlying logic controlling the token can be swapped out by whoever controls the upgrade key — in practice, this gives that party the ability to change how the token behaves after you hold it, including introducing new restrictions that don't exist today. Top-10 wallets hold 98.5% of the supply, meaning a very small number of addresses could move a large share of tokens at once, which can affect price if they choose to sell. Liquidity is not locked, so whoever provided the trading pool could withdraw it, which would make the token difficult or impossible to sell at a reasonable price. On the more reassuring side, the buy/sell simulation found the token sellable with 0% tax in both directions, and no admin mint, pause, or blacklist functions were detected in the contract on the date of this check — meaning those specific tools for restricting or diluting holders were not found present.
It's worth being clear about what this check does not cover. This is an automated read of the contract's code and on-chain data only — it doesn't know who's behind the project, whether "Sandisk Corporation" in the name has any connection to the real company of that name, what the token is meant to be used for, or whether any documentation, roadmap, or legal entity behind it is accurate or exists at all. No human has reviewed this token, and nothing here assesses the team's intentions, past conduct, or the fairness of how tokens were distributed beyond the raw concentration figure.
Before considering any transaction, it would be worth independently verifying the connection (if any) between this token and the real Sandisk Corporation, since a matching name does not establish a relationship. Look at the liquidity pool directly on a block explorer to see who owns it and how much is in it, given it isn't locked. Review the verified source code yourself, or ask someone who can, particularly the upgrade/proxy admin function, to see who holds that control and what powers it grants. Check whether the top holder wallets are known exchange or team addresses versus unrelated individual wallets, since concentration alone doesn't tell you who those addresses belong to. Finally, treat the 0% tax and no-flags-detected results as a snapshot for this date only — contract behaviour tied to an upgradeable proxy can change after this check was run.
Contracts change after they are checked. Tell us where to reach you and we will say when this one does. Free for three contracts, no account.
We checked 18 points out of 100.
The other 82 are where money is usually lost: who the team is, where the tokens sit, what the documents actually say, and what the project chose not to put on its front page.