| Risk factor | Finding | Evidence | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sellable | Yes | Transfer simulation | 24 Oct 2026 |
| Buy tax | 0% | Contract | 24 Oct 2026 |
| Sell tax | No data | Contract | 24 Oct 2026 |
| Admin mint | Enabled | Contract | 24 Oct 2026 |
| Transfers pausable | Not present | Contract | 24 Oct 2026 |
| Address blacklist | Enabled | Contract | 24 Oct 2026 |
| Upgradeable proxy | No | Contract | 24 Oct 2026 |
| Source verified | Yes | Block explorer | 24 Oct 2026 |
| Top-10 holders | 0.4% | Holder distribution | 24 Oct 2026 |
| Liquidity locked | No | LP holders | 24 Oct 2026 |
| Holders | 24312 | Token contract | 24 Oct 2026 |
| Deployed by | 0xb18a14…3915bb |
| Current owner | 0x9e2fab…f610dd |
| Holders | 24,312 |
| Rank | Address | Share |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | 0x96c827…d884d6 | 0.07% |
| #2 | 0x412c4f…aec5ed | 0.04% |
| #3 | 0xd77938…247b4a | 0.04% |
| #4 | 0xe1423e…e81234 | 0.04% |
| #5 | 0x94a89c…c1c440 | 0.03% |
This automated check on DogMoon's contract (BSC) returned a score of 15 out of 18, based on the mechanics written into the contract itself, as they existed at the time of the check. A few of the findings are worth translating into plain terms. The contract allows the owner to mint new supply at will, meaning new tokens can be created and added to circulation whenever the owner chooses, which can dilute the value of tokens already held. The contract also supports blacklisting, meaning the owner has the technical ability to block specific wallet addresses from transferring or selling their tokens. In the simulation run as part of this check, selling was possible and no honeypot behaviour was detected on that date, and buy tax was recorded at 0%, though sell tax data was not available. No pause function or upgradeable proxy was found, meaning the contract's rules are less likely to change in ways other than through minting or blacklisting. Holder concentration is low, with the top ten wallets holding 0.4% of supply, and the contract source is verified on the block explorer, meaning the code is publicly readable. Liquidity is not locked, meaning whoever controls the liquidity pool retains the ability to withdraw it.
It's important to be clear about what this check does not cover. It reads contract code and on-chain data only, at a single point in time. It says nothing about who the team behind DogMoon actually is, whether they intend to use the mint or blacklist functions, how tokens are allocated or scheduled to unlock, whether there's a legal entity behind the project, or whether any claims made in marketing materials are accurate. A contract can look technically unremarkable while still being attached to a team with no accountability, and conversely, functions like mint or blacklist exist in plenty of legitimate projects for administrative reasons. Mechanics are not intent, and this check cannot assess intent.
Before deciding anything, it would be worth looking at who holds the contract's owner key and whether it's a multisig or a single wallet, checking whether ownership has been renounced, reviewing the liquidity pool directly to see who controls it and for how long it's been sitting unlocked, reading any audit reports if they exist and checking who produced them, and looking at the team's public identity and track record. None of this constitutes a recommendation to buy, hold, or sell, and the findings above reflect contract behaviour observed on the date of the check, not a judgement on the project as a whole.
Contracts change after they are checked. Tell us where to reach you and we will say when this one does. Free for three contracts, no account.
We checked 18 points out of 100.
The other 82 are where money is usually lost: who the team is, where the tokens sit, what the documents actually say, and what the project chose not to put on its front page.