| Risk factor | Finding | Evidence | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sellable | No — the sell tax takes the whole sale | ChainSift simulation | 4 Nov 2026 |
| Buy tax | 0% | Contract | 4 Nov 2026 |
| Sell tax | 100% | ChainSift simulation | 4 Nov 2026 |
| Admin mint | No data | Contract | 4 Nov 2026 |
| Transfers pausable | No data | Contract | 4 Nov 2026 |
| Address blacklist | No data | Contract | 4 Nov 2026 |
| Upgradeable proxy | No data | Contract | 4 Nov 2026 |
| Source verified | No | Block explorer | 4 Nov 2026 |
| Top-10 holders | 100% | Holder distribution | 4 Nov 2026 |
| Liquidity locked | No | LP holders | 4 Nov 2026 |
| Holders | 22 | Token contract | 4 Nov 2026 |
| Deployed by | 0xe9300b…66cd50 |
| Holders | 22 |
| Rank | Address | Share |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | 0x42047d…f116a5 | 53.10% |
| #2 · contract | 0xe9300b…66cd50 | 46.90% |
| #3 | 0x97f323…883fef | 0.00% |
| #4 · contract | 0x4692ed…948f62 | 0.00% |
| #5 | 0x96ff6b…c1f8d6 | 0.00% |
This automated check found that roadster (BSC) scores 0 out of 18, and the result that matters most is the first one: a simulated sale of this token failed because the contract's sell tax is set to 100%. In practice, this means that anyone who buys roadster right now would not be able to sell it back — the contract routes the entire proceeds of a sale away from the seller. This is what's commonly called a honeypot. Alongside this, the contract's source code is not verified on the block explorer, meaning nobody can read the actual logic behind these numbers in plain language — ChainSift's finding is based on simulated behaviour and bytecode analysis, not a human audit of readable code. Liquidity is also not locked, so whoever controls the liquidity pool retains the ability to withdraw it at any time, and the top 10 holders currently control 100% of the supply, meaning a very small number of wallets hold the entire circulating token base.
It's important to be clear about what this check does not tell you. This is an automated, mechanical read of the contract and simulated transactions — it says nothing about who is behind the project, what their intentions are, whether any team identity has been disclosed, how the token is meant to be used, or whether any marketing claims about it hold up. No person has reviewed this token or its promotional materials. A score of 0 reflects contract-level behaviour detected on the date of this check, not a judgement on the people running it or the project's future.
Given that selling is currently blocked, there is no amount of money — including a small "test" purchase — that would behave differently from a larger one: funds placed into a token that cannot be sold remain in the token. If you want to understand more about this contract before considering any involvement, the concrete next steps are to look up the contract address on the BscScan block explorer and check whether the source code has since been verified, look at the liquidity pool directly to see who holds the LP tokens and whether they're locked anywhere, review the holder list for wallet concentration changes, and search for any independent audit reports tied to this specific contract address rather than the project name alone. None of this changes the fact that, as of this check, the contract simulation shows a 100% sell tax and no detected way to exit a position.
Contracts change after they are checked. Tell us where to reach you and we will say when this one does. Free for three contracts, no account.
We checked 18 points out of 100.
The other 82 are where money is usually lost: who the team is, where the tokens sit, what the documents actually say, and what the project chose not to put on its front page.
Trading a meme coin? The meme coin check shows how much real money is in the pool and what you lose selling $1,000, who can pull that money out, who holds the supply and how it trades — ready within 3 minutes of payment, day or night.