Before you buy: Liquidity is not locked. Who can pull it out, how much real money is in the pool, and what do you lose selling $1,000?
| Risk factor | Finding | Evidence | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sellable | Yes | Transfer simulation | 4 Nov 2026 |
| Buy tax | 0% | Contract | 4 Nov 2026 |
| Sell tax | 0% | Contract | 4 Nov 2026 |
| Admin mint | Not present | Contract | 4 Nov 2026 |
| Transfers pausable | Not present | Contract | 4 Nov 2026 |
| Address blacklist | Not present | Contract | 4 Nov 2026 |
| Upgradeable proxy | No | Contract | 4 Nov 2026 |
| Source verified | Yes | Block explorer | 4 Nov 2026 |
| Top-10 holders | 53.8% | Holder distribution | 4 Nov 2026 |
| Liquidity locked | No | LP holders | 4 Nov 2026 |
| Holders | 3533 | Token contract | 4 Nov 2026 |
| Deployed by | 0xe1ee48…dc5e4b |
| Current owner | None — ownership renounced |
| Holders | 3,533 |
| Rank | Address | Share |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | 0xe48602…08eb28 | 13.98% |
| #2 | 0xdfaca7…e02b1b | 11.90% |
| #3 | 0x9fea18…96b650 | 7.08% |
| #4 · Uniswap v4 pool · contract | 0x28e2ea…e9e9df | 6.91% |
| #5 | 0xe02062…3bb937 | 3.15% |
This automated check of the Xoge contract on BNB Chain scored 14 out of 18. In practical terms, the scan found no honeypot behaviour: a transfer simulation showed the token can be sold, and both the buy and sell tax read as 0% directly from the contract code. No admin mint function was detected, meaning the owner does not appear able to create new tokens out of thin air and dilute holders. Transfers are not pausable and there is no blacklist function present, so nothing in the code lets the owner freeze transfers or lock specific wallets out of trading, as of the date of this check. The contract is also not an upgradeable proxy, so its logic cannot be swapped out later without deploying a new contract entirely. Two things stand out as risk indicators rather than red flags in themselves: the top 10 holders control 53.8% of supply, which is a concentrated distribution that could allow coordinated selling to move the price significantly, and liquidity is not locked, meaning whoever controls the liquidity pool could withdraw it at any time, which would affect the ability to trade the token at a reasonable price.
It's important to be clear about what this check does not cover. This is an automated read of the contract's mechanics only — it looks at what the code technically allows, not at who is behind the project, what their intentions are, or whether the roadmap, marketing claims, or tokenomics make sense. Source code being verified means the code is visible and matches what's deployed; it does not mean the code has been judged sound by a human reviewer, and no human has reviewed this token as part of this check. Nothing here speaks to legal structure, team identity, or whether promotional claims about the project are accurate.
Before putting money into this or any token, it's worth looking at who holds the liquidity pool tokens and whether that wallet is controlled by a known, locked contract versus an individual wallet. Checking the project's transaction history on the block explorer for large recent transfers by top holders, looking into whether the team is public or anonymous, and searching for independent discussion of the project outside of its own channels are all reasonable next steps. None of this replaces doing that independent research, and nothing in this report should be read as a recommendation to buy, hold, or sell.
Contracts change after they are checked. Tell us where to reach you and we will say when this one does. Free for three contracts, no account.
We checked 18 points out of 100.
The other 82 are where money is usually lost: who the team is, where the tokens sit, what the documents actually say, and what the project chose not to put on its front page.
Trading a meme coin? The meme coin check shows how much real money is in the pool and what you lose selling $1,000, who can pull that money out, who holds the supply and how it trades — ready within 3 minutes of payment, day or night.