| Risk factor | Finding | Evidence | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sellable | Yes | Transfer simulation | 22 Sept 2026 |
| Buy tax | 0% | Contract | 22 Sept 2026 |
| Sell tax | 0% | Contract | 22 Sept 2026 |
| Admin mint | Enabled | Contract | 22 Sept 2026 |
| Transfers pausable | Enabled | Contract | 22 Sept 2026 |
| Address blacklist | Not present | Contract | 22 Sept 2026 |
| Upgradeable proxy | No | Contract | 22 Sept 2026 |
| Source verified | Yes | Block explorer | 22 Sept 2026 |
| Top-10 holders | 88.9% | Holder distribution | 22 Sept 2026 |
| Liquidity locked | No | LP holders | 22 Sept 2026 |
| Holders | 52481 | Token contract | 22 Sept 2026 |
| Deployed by | 0x5c188f…d227e3 |
| Holders | 52,481 |
| Rank | Address | Share |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | 0x4f1b24…ca133e | 22.82% |
| #2 | 0xeac0b4…fb80b6 | 20.00% |
| #3 | 0xe6a286…7f00c1 | 12.32% |
| #4 | 0xe21a81…e33767 | 8.39% |
| #5 | 0x371d21…e862ee | 7.90% |
This automated check of AEON on BSC scored 10 out of 18, and several findings are worth understanding in plain terms. The contract's owner can mint new supply, which means new tokens can be created and added to circulation at any time, potentially diluting what existing holders own. Transfers can be paused by the owner, meaning the ability to buy, sell, or move AEON could be switched off for some or all wallets without holders having any say in it. Top-10 wallets hold 88.9% of the supply, which is a high concentration — if any of those wallets sell in size, it could move the price sharply, and coordinated selling by a small group is easier when ownership is this concentrated. On a more reassuring note, no honeypot behaviour was detected: the simulation showed the token can be sold, and buy and sell taxes both read as 0% at the time of the check. The contract source is verified on the block explorer, which allows the code to be read by anyone, and no blacklist function or upgradeable proxy was detected, meaning the contract logic is not designed to be swapped out later, at least not through this specific mechanism. Liquidity is not locked, however, which means whoever provided the trading pool could withdraw it, and there is no on-chain guarantee it will stay in place.
It's important to be clear about what this check does not cover. This is an automated read of the contract's mechanics — the code itself — on the date of the check. It says nothing about who the team behind AEON is, whether they have a track record, how the tokenomics are designed to play out over time, what promises have been made in marketing or a whitepaper, or whether any legal structure or regulatory registration exists. A contract can look mechanically unremarkable and still be attached to a project with no real plan, no functioning product, or no accountable team. None of that is visible from bytecode alone.
Before putting money in, it's worth looking at a few concrete things beyond this report. Check whether the liquidity pool tokens are actually locked or burned, and for how long, using a lock-verification service or the LP token holder address directly. Look at who holds the top wallets and whether any are known exchange, team, or vesting addresses rather than independent holders. Search for the team's public identity, prior projects, and any audits from a named reviewer. Read the project's own documentation on minting and pause functions to see whether their use is constrained by a multisig, timelock, or governance process, or left entirely to a single wallet.
Contracts change after they are checked. Tell us where to reach you and we will say when this one does. Free for three contracts, no account.
We checked 18 points out of 100.
The other 82 are where money is usually lost: who the team is, where the tokens sit, what the documents actually say, and what the project chose not to put on its front page.