| Risk factor | Finding | Evidence | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sellable | No — the sell tax takes the whole sale | ChainSift simulation | 4 Nov 2026 |
| Buy tax | 0% | Contract | 4 Nov 2026 |
| Sell tax | 100% | ChainSift simulation | 4 Nov 2026 |
| Admin mint | No data | Contract | 4 Nov 2026 |
| Transfers pausable | No data | Contract | 4 Nov 2026 |
| Address blacklist | No data | Contract | 4 Nov 2026 |
| Upgradeable proxy | No data | Contract | 4 Nov 2026 |
| Source verified | No | Block explorer | 4 Nov 2026 |
| Top-10 holders | 100% | Holder distribution | 4 Nov 2026 |
| Liquidity locked | No | LP holders | 4 Nov 2026 |
| Holders | 35 | Token contract | 4 Nov 2026 |
| Deployed by | 0xe9300b…66cd50 |
| Holders | 35 |
| Rank | Address | Share |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | 0x42047d…f116a5 | 54.05% |
| #2 · contract | 0xe9300b…66cd50 | 45.95% |
| #3 | 0x2cc030…ff3836 | 0.00% |
| #4 | 0x604874…4d5b32 | 0.00% |
| #5 | 0x188d03…69ea89 | 0.00% |
This automated check scored josix (BSC) 0 out of 18, and the findings point to a contract that, as currently simulated, does not allow holders to sell. A simulated sale returned a 100% sell tax, meaning the full value of a sale is effectively taken by the contract — this is the behaviour commonly called a honeypot. Alongside this, the contract's source code is not verified on the block explorer, so its logic can only be read from compiled bytecode rather than human-readable code, and liquidity is not locked, meaning whoever controls the liquidity pool could withdraw it without a time restriction. Top-10 wallets hold 100% of the supply across just 35 total holders, indicating very high concentration — a small number of addresses could move or dump most of the token's supply. Taken together, these are mechanics that allow whoever controls the contract and liquidity to restrict exits and influence price almost completely.
It's worth being clear about what this check does not cover. This is an automated read of contract mechanics only — it simulates buy and sell behaviour, inspects tax settings, and checks holder and liquidity data on-chain. It does not assess the team behind the token, their intentions, the project's tokenomics or roadmap, marketing claims, or any legal or regulatory status. No human has reviewed this token, and a score of 0 here reflects detected contract-level behaviour on the date of the check, not a judgement about the people or plans behind it. Flags not listed as detected (such as admin mint or pausable transfers showing "no data") mean the check could not confirm their presence or absence — not that they are ruled out.
Given that selling is currently blocked in simulation, this is not a case where a small test purchase would help confirm anything: funds placed into a token that cannot be sold remain in that token. If you want to understand more about this contract before considering any involvement, you could look at the contract source directly once or if it becomes verified, review the liquidity pool and its lock status on a block explorer, check whether the deployer wallet has a history of similar tokens, and look at how the 100% sell tax is implemented in the code to understand exactly which function is blocking sales. None of this changes the fact that the current sell simulation failed — it only helps you understand why.
Contracts change after they are checked. Tell us where to reach you and we will say when this one does. Free for three contracts, no account.
We checked 18 points out of 100.
The other 82 are where money is usually lost: who the team is, where the tokens sit, what the documents actually say, and what the project chose not to put on its front page.
Trading a meme coin? The meme coin check shows how much real money is in the pool and what you lose selling $1,000, who can pull that money out, who holds the supply and how it trades — ready within 3 minutes of payment, day or night.