Before you buy: How much real money is in the pool, what do you lose selling $1,000, and who can pull it out?
| Risk factor | Finding | Evidence | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sellable | No data | Transfer simulation | 4 Nov 2026 |
| Buy tax | 0% | Contract | 4 Nov 2026 |
| Sell tax | 0% | Contract | 4 Nov 2026 |
| Admin mint | Enabled | Implementation code | 4 Nov 2026 |
| Transfers pausable | Not found | Implementation code | 4 Nov 2026 |
| Address blacklist | Not found | Implementation code | 4 Nov 2026 |
| Upgradeable proxy | Yes — a timelock with a 1-day delay can replace the code | Proxy contract | 4 Nov 2026 |
| Source verified | Yes | Block explorer | 4 Nov 2026 |
| Top-10 holders | 73.6% | Holder distribution | 4 Nov 2026 |
| Holders | 7291 | Token contract | 4 Nov 2026 |
| Deployed by | 0x0806d3…e2a045 |
| Code can be replaced by | 0x07d274…735253 — a timelock with a 1-day delay |
| Current code | 0x2f1e42…ecd735 |
| Holders | 7,291 |
| Rank | Address | Share |
|---|---|---|
| #1 · contract | 0x0ac26b…06217e | 43.55% |
| #2 · contract | 0x57d565…b5c5c9 | 23.93% |
| #3 · contract | 0xbd35a3…24a975 | 2.20% |
| #4 · contract | 0x18dde4…f309b8 | 1.29% |
| #5 | 0x2d96cd…2a030e | 0.60% |
This automated check of FNVDAB on BSC returned a score of 5 out of 10, based on contract mechanics observed on the date of the check. A few findings are worth translating into plain terms. The contract owner can mint new tokens at will, which means the circulating supply can be increased at any time, diluting the value of existing holdings. The contract is also upgradeable through a proxy, with a 1-day timelock delay — this means whoever controls the admin keys can replace the entire contract code, including every rule and permission listed in this report, after that delay passes. In effect, nearly every protection or limitation described here could be changed in the future. Top-10 wallets hold 73.6% of the supply, a concentration level that means a small number of holders could influence price significantly through their own buying or selling. Source code is verified on the block explorer, which allows the code to be read but does not by itself indicate anything about intent or safety. One important gap: the data source could not confirm whether the token is sellable through a transfer simulation. No data was returned either way, so this was not scored, and it should not be read as reassurance.
It's worth being clear about what this check does not do. It only reads the contract's code and on-chain structure — it has no visibility into who the team is, whether they are doxxed or anonymous, how tokenomics are designed, what legal entity (if any) stands behind the project, or what the stated intentions are. No human has reviewed this contract or the project behind it; everything here was generated automatically from on-chain data.
Given that sellability could not be confirmed, this is not a case where a small test transaction is a sensible way to check — if a token turns out to be unsellable, any funds placed into it remain stuck regardless of the amount. Before considering any action, you may want to look for independent confirmation of sell transactions on a block explorer, review who holds the admin and timelock keys and whether they are disclosed, look into the project's public communications and team identity, and check whether the large holder wallets are linked to exchanges, liquidity pools, or team allocations rather than independent buyers.
Contracts change after they are checked. Tell us where to reach you and we will say when this one does. Free for three contracts, no account.
We checked 10 points out of 100.
The other 90 are where money is usually lost: who the team is, where the tokens sit, what the documents actually say, and what the project chose not to put on its front page.
Trading a meme coin? The meme coin check shows how much real money is in the pool and what you lose selling $1,000, who can pull that money out, who holds the supply and how it trades — ready within 3 minutes of payment, day or night.