| Risk factor | Finding | Evidence | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sellable | Yes | Transfer simulation | 20 Oct 2026 |
| Buy tax | 3.1% | Contract | 20 Oct 2026 |
| Sell tax | 5.2% | Contract | 20 Oct 2026 |
| Admin mint | Not present | Contract | 20 Oct 2026 |
| Transfers pausable | Not present | Contract | 20 Oct 2026 |
| Address blacklist | Not present | Contract | 20 Oct 2026 |
| Upgradeable proxy | No | Contract | 20 Oct 2026 |
| Source verified | Yes | Block explorer | 20 Oct 2026 |
| Top-10 holders | 29.1% | Holder distribution | 20 Oct 2026 |
| Liquidity locked | 100% until 19 Oct 2056 | LP holders · PinkLock02 | 20 Oct 2026 |
| Holders | 461 | Token contract | 20 Oct 2026 |
| Deployed by | 0x8ff499…7fc9e7 |
| Current owner | 0x8ff499…7fc9e7 |
| Holders | 461 |
| Rank | Address | Share |
|---|---|---|
| #1 · PancakeV2 · contract | 0x5498e2…915c0c | 9.23% |
| #2 | 0x81a7ac…eefcb2 | 2.60% |
| #3 | 0x2dd8ab…6bbf98 | 2.50% |
| #4 | 0x0cc07f…b99703 | 2.25% |
| #5 | 0xff4990…d0fcfe | 2.20% |
This automated check looked at Cougarcoin's contract code on BSC and found that a sale was successfully simulated, meaning holders are currently able to sell the token rather than being trapped in a honeypot. A transfer tax applies: 3.1% on buys and up to 5.2% on sells, which is a built-in fee that reduces the amount received on each transaction, split between the two sides of a trade. No minting function was detected, which means the contract owner does not appear able to create new tokens and dilute supply. No pause function or blacklist capability was found, so, based on the code as checked, the owner does not currently have a built-in way to freeze transfers or block specific wallets from trading. The contract is not upgradeable through a proxy, meaning its code cannot be swapped out for different logic later. Top-10 wallets hold 29.1% of supply, a concentration level that means a small number of holders could influence the market if they sold at the same time. Liquidity is reported as 100% locked until October 2056, which indicates that, as of the check date, the liquidity pool tokens are time-locked rather than freely withdrawable by whoever controls them.
None of this tells you who runs the project, what they intend to do with it, or whether the tokenomics make sense as an investment. This check only reads contract mechanics as they exist on-chain at the time of the scan; it does not assess the team's identity or track record, marketing claims, roadmap credibility, legal structure, or whether future contract changes or off-chain actions could alter the picture. A high score here reflects the absence of certain detected technical red flags on this date, not an endorsement of the project or a guarantee of future behaviour. The check is fully automated; no person has reviewed this contract or project.
Before putting any money in, it's worth independently verifying the liquidity lock directly on the lock platform referenced (PinkLock02) to confirm the unlock date and the amount actually locked, rather than relying solely on this summary. Look at how the top-10 wallets are labelled — some may be exchange or lock contracts rather than individual holders, which changes what that concentration figure means. Check whether the contract owner address still holds any special privileges not captured above, such as the ability to change tax rates, and whether ownership has been renounced. Research the team's public presence, any audits from named third parties, and community discussion of the project's history. Re-running this type of check periodically is also sensible, since contracts and their surrounding conditions, such as locks or ownership, can change after the date of any single scan.
Contracts change after they are checked. Tell us where to reach you and we will say when this one does. Free for three contracts, no account.
We checked 18 points out of 100.
The other 82 are where money is usually lost: who the team is, where the tokens sit, what the documents actually say, and what the project chose not to put on its front page.