| Risk factor | Finding | Evidence | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sellable | Yes | Transfer simulation | 29 Oct 2026 |
| Buy tax | 4% | Contract | 29 Oct 2026 |
| Sell tax | 4.1% | Contract | 29 Oct 2026 |
| Admin mint | Not present | Contract | 29 Oct 2026 |
| Transfers pausable | Not present | Contract | 29 Oct 2026 |
| Address blacklist | Not present | Contract | 29 Oct 2026 |
| Upgradeable proxy | No | Contract | 29 Oct 2026 |
| Source verified | Yes | Block explorer | 29 Oct 2026 |
| Top-10 holders | 49.1% | Holder distribution | 29 Oct 2026 |
| Liquidity locked | 84.7% until 30 Oct 2030 | LP holders · UNCX | 29 Oct 2026 |
| Holders | 482 | Token contract | 29 Oct 2026 |
| Deployed by | 0xd9ba26…7a5212 |
| Current owner | 0x000000…00dead |
| Holders | 482 |
| Rank | Address | Share |
|---|---|---|
| #1 · PancakeV2 · contract | 0x541b06…f42295 | 15.89% |
| #2 · burned | 0x000000…00dead | 7.00% |
| #3 | 0xe57520…91d168 | 4.06% |
| #4 | 0x639ae0…888d0b | 3.68% |
| #5 · contract | 0x52313d…7df237 | 3.64% |
This automated check of AYE (ARYEH TOKEN) on BNB Chain scored 15 out of 18, and a few things are worth translating into plain terms. A transfer tax of up to 4.1% means that on every buy and sell, a slice of the transaction value is taken by the contract, so the amount you end up with after selling will be somewhat less than a simple price-difference calculation would suggest — this was confirmed directly from the contract code, not estimated. A test transfer simulation found the token sellable on the date of the check, with no honeypot behaviour detected — that is, nothing in the code was found that blocks holders from selling. No admin mint function, no transfer-pausing mechanism, no blacklist capability, and no upgradeable proxy were detected, which means that, as of this check, the contract owner does not appear to hold the ability to create new tokens out of thin air, freeze transfers, block specific wallets, or swap in new contract logic. Liquidity locked at 84.7% until October 2030 was verified against UNCX's lock records, meaning most of the trading pool backing the token is committed not to be withdrawn before that date. Top-10 holders controlling 49.1% of supply is a concentration flag: it means fewer than ten wallets can, if they choose to sell, influence the price substantially — this is a holder-distribution fact, not a comment on who those holders are or why they hold the tokens.
It's important to be clear about what this check does not cover. This is a purely automated read of contract mechanics — tax functions, mint and pause capabilities, proxy structure, liquidity lock status, and holder distribution as recorded on-chain. It says nothing about who is behind the project, whether the team has a track record, how the tokenomics are designed to play out over time, whether any legal entity stands behind the token, or what the stated intentions of the deployers are. No person has reviewed this contract or the project behind it — the findings come entirely from automated analysis of what's publicly recorded on-chain.
Before putting money into this or any token, it's worth independently verifying the contract address matches official project channels, looking into who the team is and whether they're identifiable, checking whether the liquidity lock can be confirmed directly on UNCX's own site rather than taking a single source at face value, reviewing the concentration of those top holders to see if any are known exchange or team wallets, and reading the project's own documentation for how the transfer tax is used. Checking community discussion and any independent audits, where they exist, can also add context this automated check does not provide.
Contracts change after they are checked. Tell us where to reach you and we will say when this one does. Free for three contracts, no account.
We checked 18 points out of 100.
The other 82 are where money is usually lost: who the team is, where the tokens sit, what the documents actually say, and what the project chose not to put on its front page.