| Risk factor | Finding | Evidence | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sellable | Yes | Transfer simulation | 11 Oct 2026 |
| Buy tax | 0% | Contract | 11 Oct 2026 |
| Sell tax | 0% | Contract | 11 Oct 2026 |
| Admin mint | Not present | Contract | 11 Oct 2026 |
| Transfers pausable | Not present | Contract | 11 Oct 2026 |
| Address blacklist | Not present | Contract | 11 Oct 2026 |
| Upgradeable proxy | No | Contract | 11 Oct 2026 |
| Source verified | Yes | Block explorer | 11 Oct 2026 |
| Top-10 holders | 18.6% | Holder distribution | 11 Oct 2026 |
| Liquidity locked | No | LP holders | 11 Oct 2026 |
| Holders | 4972 | Token contract | 11 Oct 2026 |
| Deployed by | 0xb00271…985adb |
| Current owner | None — ownership renounced |
| Holders | 4,972 |
| Rank | Address | Share |
|---|---|---|
| #1 · contract | 0xfd55be…d966e9 | 5.20% |
| #2 · contract | 0xbbc1cf…79731b | 2.16% |
| #3 | 0x728dbe…fabbf3 | 1.78% |
| #4 | 0x498208…6e89cb | 1.55% |
| #5 | 0x616cc3…59b649 | 1.47% |
This automated check of the GM (GREEN MORNING) contract on BSC returned a score of 18 out of 18 based on contract mechanics observed on the date of the check. In practical terms, this means the contract's code did not show an admin mint function, so the ability to create new tokens out of thin air was not detected. No pausable-transfer function was found, meaning the contract owner does not appear to hold a switch that could freeze all token movement. No blacklist function was detected, so there is no evidence the owner can block specific wallets from trading. The contract is not an upgradeable proxy, which means its logic cannot be silently swapped for different code later. Buy and sell tax are both set to 0%, and a transfer simulation confirmed the token is sellable, meaning no honeypot behaviour was detected at the time of testing. The source code is verified on the block explorer, so the logic behind these findings is publicly auditable rather than hidden. Top-10 wallets hold 18.6% of supply across 4,972 holders, which is a moderate concentration level worth keeping in view. One flag stands out: liquidity is not locked, meaning whoever controls the liquidity pool retains the technical ability to withdraw it at any time, which is a distinct action from anything the token contract itself controls.
It's important to be clear about what this check does not cover. This is an automated read of contract code and on-chain data only — it says nothing about who is behind the project, whether the team's identity is known or verifiable, how tokens are allocated or scheduled to unlock, whether there is a legal entity standing behind the token, or the intent of those running it. A contract can score well on mechanics while still being part of a project with weak fundamentals, undisclosed allocations, or coordinated plans among large holders.
Before deciding anything, it would be worth looking into who holds the liquidity pool tokens and whether that wallet has a history of removing liquidity from other projects, since no lock was found here. It's also worth researching the team's public presence, reading any available audit reports beyond this automated check, reviewing the token's distribution and vesting schedule in detail, and checking community discussion for reports of past issues. None of the above should be treated as a recommendation to buy, hold, or sell this token.
Contracts change after they are checked. Tell us where to reach you and we will say when this one does. Free for three contracts, no account.
We checked 18 points out of 100.
The other 82 are where money is usually lost: who the team is, where the tokens sit, what the documents actually say, and what the project chose not to put on its front page.