| Risk factor | Finding | Evidence | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sellable | Yes | Transfer simulation | 10 Sept 2026 |
| Buy tax | 0% | Contract | 10 Sept 2026 |
| Sell tax | 0% | Contract | 10 Sept 2026 |
| Admin mint | Enabled | Contract | 10 Sept 2026 |
| Transfers pausable | Not present | Contract | 10 Sept 2026 |
| Address blacklist | Not present | Contract | 10 Sept 2026 |
| Upgradeable proxy | No | Contract | 10 Sept 2026 |
| Source verified | Yes | Block explorer | 10 Sept 2026 |
| Top-10 holders | 43.6% | Holder distribution | 10 Sept 2026 |
| Liquidity locked | No | LP holders | 10 Sept 2026 |
| Holders | 73832 | Token contract | 10 Sept 2026 |
| Deployed by | 0x88efda…810566 |
| Current owner | 0xf68a4b…fef62d |
| Holders | 73,832 |
| Rank | Address | Share |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | 0xa74e8a…4b053f | 20.85% |
| #2 | 0x21d456…da807f | 7.30% |
| #3 | 0xb42852…59b282 | 3.60% |
| #4 | 0x084399…434083 | 2.03% |
| #5 | 0xfcf053…fee4fd | 1.93% |
This automated check of the contract behind this BSC-based token labelled ATOM returned a score of 14 out of 18, based on contract mechanics observed on the date of the check. A few things stand out. The contract includes an admin mint function that was found enabled, meaning whoever controls the owner address can create new tokens at will, which can dilute existing holders' share of supply. No pause function or address blacklist was detected, so the owner does not appear able to freeze transfers or block specific wallets from trading based on this check. Buy and sell tax were both found at 0%, and a transfer simulation indicated the token was sellable at the time of testing, meaning no honeypot behaviour was detected. Holder concentration is worth noting: the top 10 wallets hold 43.6% of supply, which is a meaningful concentration — large holders selling at once could affect price more than in a widely distributed token. Liquidity was found not locked, meaning whoever supplied the trading pool could withdraw it, which would reduce or remove the ability to trade the token at that venue. The contract source is verified on the block explorer, which allows the underlying code to be read, though verification alone does not confirm intent.
It's important to understand what this check does not cover. This is an automated read of contract code and on-chain data only — it does not assess who the team behind the project is, whether they are anonymous, their track record, the token's economic design, roadmap, marketing claims, or any legal or regulatory status. A contract can show no adverse flags on a mechanical level while still carrying risk tied to the people or entity operating it, how supply is allocated, or how the project is represented elsewhere. None of the findings above should be read as a judgement on the project's legitimacy or future performance.
Before considering any transaction, it would be reasonable to look into who controls the owner and mint-related addresses and whether that control sits with a multisig, timelock, or renounced key. It's also worth checking where and how liquidity is held, since it was found unlocked here, and looking at the distribution and history of the top holder wallets to see whether concentration is tied to a small number of insiders. Reviewing the project's own documentation, any audit reports, and independent community discussion can also help build a fuller picture. This check reflects contract mechanics at a single point in time and does not constitute financial advice or a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold.
Contracts change after they are checked. Tell us where to reach you and we will say when this one does. Free for three contracts, no account.
We checked 18 points out of 100.
The other 82 are where money is usually lost: who the team is, where the tokens sit, what the documents actually say, and what the project chose not to put on its front page.