| Risk factor | Finding | Evidence | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sellable | Yes | Transfer simulation | 27 Oct 2026 |
| Buy tax | 0% | Contract | 27 Oct 2026 |
| Sell tax | 0% | Contract | 27 Oct 2026 |
| Admin mint | Not present | Contract | 27 Oct 2026 |
| Transfers pausable | Enabled | Contract | 27 Oct 2026 |
| Address blacklist | Not present | Contract | 27 Oct 2026 |
| Upgradeable proxy | No | Contract | 27 Oct 2026 |
| Source verified | Yes | Block explorer | 27 Oct 2026 |
| Top-10 holders | 13.1% | Holder distribution | 27 Oct 2026 |
| Liquidity locked | 98.4% burned | LP holders | 27 Oct 2026 |
| Holders | 5166 | Token contract | 27 Oct 2026 |
| Deployed by | 0x4eedcd…ba19d3 |
| Holders | 5,166 |
| Rank | Address | Share |
|---|---|---|
| #1 · PancakeV2 · contract | 0x0bd5de…fd0b6d | 2.43% |
| #2 · contract | 0x6ff117…91b72c | 1.88% |
| #3 · contract | 0xbebbad…7c3f44 | 1.57% |
| #4 · contract | 0x8f8782…6c4129 | 1.06% |
| #5 | 0x153a07…0ee75e | 1.04% |
This automated check of the GANG contract on BSC found that transfers can be paused by the owner. In practice, this means the person or wallet that controls the contract has the technical ability to freeze all token movement — including yours — at any time, for any reason, without needing your approval. No admin mint function was detected, meaning the contract does not appear to let the owner create new tokens out of thin air and dilute holders. No blacklist function was detected, so there is no mechanism found that would allow the owner to block specific wallets from transacting while leaving others free. A test transfer simulation found the token sellable, with 0% buy and sell tax recorded in the contract, and no honeypot behaviour was detected on the date of this check. Liquidity was found to be 98.4% burned, which typically makes it harder for the liquidity pool to be pulled by whoever added it, and the top 10 holders were found to control 13.1% of supply, a relatively low concentration compared to many newly launched tokens. The contract source is verified on the block explorer, meaning the code is publicly readable and matches what is deployed, which is what allowed this check to be run in the first place.
What this check cannot tell you is who is actually behind GANG, what they intend to do with the pause function, or whether the project has any real product, roadmap, or legal entity attached to it. A score based on contract mechanics says nothing about the team's identity, track record, marketing claims, or tokenomics design, such as how supply is allocated, vesting schedules, or planned future unlocks. None of that is assessed here. A contract can look clean on every mechanical check and still be attached to a team that disappears, changes course, or acts against holder interests using the very functions described above.
Before putting money in, it is worth looking at who holds the pause-control wallet and whether it belongs to a known team, a multisig, or a single unverified address, since that is the function with the most direct power over your ability to transact. Check whether the project has any public team identity, audit beyond automated scanning, active social presence, or history of prior projects. Look at how the top-10 holder wallets are labelled — team, exchange, or locked contract wallets carry different implications than unknown individual wallets. Finally, confirm the liquidity lock details directly against the lock contract or burn address shown on the block explorer, rather than relying solely on a summary figure.
Contracts change after they are checked. Tell us where to reach you and we will say when this one does. Free for three contracts, no account.
We checked 18 points out of 100.
The other 82 are where money is usually lost: who the team is, where the tokens sit, what the documents actually say, and what the project chose not to put on its front page.