| Risk factor | Finding | Evidence | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sellable | Yes | ChainSift simulation | 31 Oct 2026 |
| Buy tax | 90% | ChainSift simulation | 31 Oct 2026 |
| Sell tax | 90% | ChainSift simulation | 31 Oct 2026 |
| Admin mint | No data | Contract | 31 Oct 2026 |
| Transfers pausable | No data | Contract | 31 Oct 2026 |
| Address blacklist | No data | Contract | 31 Oct 2026 |
| Upgradeable proxy | No data | Contract | 31 Oct 2026 |
| Source verified | No | Block explorer | 31 Oct 2026 |
| Top-10 holders | 78.9% | Holder distribution | 31 Oct 2026 |
| Holders | 17476 | Token contract | 31 Oct 2026 |
| Deployed by | 0x3df796…726910 |
| Holders | 17,476 |
| Rank | Address | Share |
|---|---|---|
| #1 · contract | 0xa25563…bc69a0 | 53.18% |
| #2 | 0x3df796…726910 | 25.00% |
| #3 | 0x76b6ef…ff3aaa | 0.20% |
| #4 · Uniswap v4 pool · contract | 0x28e2ea…e9e9df | 0.17% |
| #5 | 0x702ca9…14926a | 0.12% |
This automated check gave IAO (Initial Agent Offering) on BNB Chain a score of 1 out of 10, and the findings point to several mechanisms that could allow significant control over what holders can do with their tokens. The most striking figure is the transfer tax of up to 90%: both the simulated buy and sell tax came back at 90%, meaning that for every transaction, nine-tenths of the value could be taken, whether or not the contract owner changes anything further. Separately, because the contract's source code is not verified on the block explorer, ChainSift could only examine the deployed bytecode, not the underlying logic. This means functions that would normally be checked — such as the ability to mint new tokens, pause transfers, blacklist addresses, or upgrade the contract via a proxy — were not reported by the data source and could not be scored. Their absence from this report does not mean these abilities are absent from the contract; it means they could not be confirmed either way on the date of this check. Finally, the top ten wallet addresses hold 78.9% of the total supply, which is a concentration level that, if those holders act in a coordinated way, could materially move the market regardless of what the contract code permits or restricts.
It is important to be clear about what this check does not cover. This is an automated, mechanical read of contract behaviour and on-chain data at a single point in time — nothing here reflects any review of the people behind the project, their intentions, the token's broader economic design, or any legal or regulatory status. A low score reflects detectable technical risk indicators, not a judgement about the team's honesty or the project's long-term viability, and a technically clean contract carries no such endorsement either.
Given that simulated sell transactions did go through (sellable: yes), but at a 90% tax, anyone holding or considering holding this token should treat that tax rate as a near-total loss on each transaction rather than a minor fee. Before going any further, it would be worth independently verifying the contract source on BscScan, searching for any official team communication or audit addressing the tax structure and the unverified code, and reviewing the holder distribution directly to see whether the top wallets are exchange or liquidity addresses rather than individual holders. None of this should be read as a recommendation to transact with this contract.
Contracts change after they are checked. Tell us where to reach you and we will say when this one does. Free for three contracts, no account.
We checked 10 points out of 100.
The other 90 are where money is usually lost: who the team is, where the tokens sit, what the documents actually say, and what the project chose not to put on its front page.
Trading a meme coin? The meme coin check shows how much real money is in the pool and what you lose selling $1,000, who can pull that money out, who holds the supply and how it trades — ready within 3 minutes of payment, day or night.