| Risk factor | Finding | Evidence | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sellable | Yes | Transfer simulation | 18 Oct 2026 |
| Buy tax | 3% | Contract | 18 Oct 2026 |
| Sell tax | 3% | Contract | 18 Oct 2026 |
| Admin mint | Not present | Contract | 18 Oct 2026 |
| Transfers pausable | Not present | Contract | 18 Oct 2026 |
| Address blacklist | Not present | Contract | 18 Oct 2026 |
| Upgradeable proxy | No | Contract | 18 Oct 2026 |
| Source verified | Yes | Block explorer | 18 Oct 2026 |
| Top-10 holders | 54.9% | Holder distribution | 18 Oct 2026 |
| Liquidity locked | 99.9% burned | LP holders | 18 Oct 2026 |
| Holders | 1293 | Token contract | 18 Oct 2026 |
| Deployed by | 0x9a4a0d…d492cd |
| Current owner | None — ownership renounced |
| Holders | 1,293 |
| Rank | Address | Share |
|---|---|---|
| #1 · burned | 0x000000…00dead | 20.54% |
| #2 · PancakeV2 · contract | 0xe3d795…ba138c | 11.80% |
| #3 · contract | 0x4fd8a1…f44c55 | 4.00% |
| #4 | 0x73c121…62e1df | 3.79% |
| #5 · contract | 0x0934b2…23f7fc | 3.39% |
This automated check looked at the contract code behind "hooks" (PICKHOOKS) on BSC and scored it 13 out of 18. In practice, that score reflects a handful of specific mechanics. A transfer tax of up to 3% on both buys and sells means a small percentage of every trade is deducted automatically by the contract — this is a built-in fee, not something that changes per transaction, but it does reduce what a buyer or seller actually receives. No admin mint function was detected, meaning that, as of this check, the contract owner does not appear to have a coded way to create new tokens and dilute holders. No pause function and no blacklist function were detected either, meaning the owner does not appear to currently have a way to freeze transfers generally or block specific wallets from trading. The contract is not upgradeable via proxy, so the underlying code is not set up to be swapped out later. Liquidity is 99.9% burned, which means the trading pool backing the token has largely been made inaccessible to withdrawal — this reduces (though does not eliminate) the risk of liquidity being pulled out from under holders. Top-10 wallets hold 54.9% of supply, which is a concentration level worth noting, since large holders selling in size can affect price and available liquidity for everyone else.
It's worth being clear about what this check does not cover. This is an automated read of contract mechanics only — tax rates, mint/pause/blacklist functions, liquidity lock status, and holder distribution as recorded on-chain at the time of the check. It says nothing about who built the token, their track record, intentions, or whether any off-chain promises match on-chain reality. It does not assess tokenomics design, roadmap credibility, marketing claims, legal structure, or whether the project has any real utility. A clean mechanical reading is not an endorsement and does not mean the token or its team should be trusted.
Before putting money into anything, it's worth independently verifying the liquidity lock yourself on a block explorer or lock-checking service, looking at how concentrated the top wallets are and whether any are linked to the deployer, reviewing the verified source code line by line or having someone who can do so look it over, checking for any social presence, audit history, or public team identity, and treating any findings here as one input among several rather than a final verdict.
Contracts change after they are checked. Tell us where to reach you and we will say when this one does. Free for three contracts, no account.
We checked 18 points out of 100.
The other 82 are where money is usually lost: who the team is, where the tokens sit, what the documents actually say, and what the project chose not to put on its front page.