PERM On-Chain Risk Check

PermawebDAO · BSC · 0x0505d375ac6d09228fdf19089748133a0ebf210b
12 / 18 On-chain Check
Checked 1 Nov 2026. On-chain Check, 18 of the 100-point ChainSift Score — what it covers.

Before you buy: How much real money is in the pool, what do you lose selling $1,000, and who can pull it out?

Evidence

Risk factorFindingEvidenceDate
Sellable Yes Transfer simulation 1 Nov 2026
Buy tax 0% Contract 1 Nov 2026
Sell tax 0% Contract 1 Nov 2026
Admin mint Not present Contract 1 Nov 2026
Transfers pausable Not present Contract 1 Nov 2026
Address blacklist Not present Contract 1 Nov 2026
Upgradeable proxy No Contract 1 Nov 2026
Source verified Yes Block explorer 1 Nov 2026
Top-10 holders 97.8% Holder distribution 1 Nov 2026
Holders 112 Token contract 1 Nov 2026

This contract — PERM

Deployed by0x58d03f…08f01d
Current owner0xabe663…507cd4
Holders112

Largest holders

RankAddressShare
#1 0x498208…6e89cb 87.68%
#2 0x78424d…943ca6 2.35%
#3 0x84c24f…97d095 1.69%
#4 0xc7f7c3…52cc10 1.24%
#5 0x7e7315…df1f0e 1.19%

What this means

This automated check looked at PERM's contract code and simulated a transaction to see what the owner is technically able to do to holders, and what it found is a mixed picture. A test sale went through, and no honeypot behaviour was detected, meaning the contract did not block or trap a simulated sell on the date of this check. Buy and sell taxes were both found to be 0%, so no hidden fee mechanism was detected that could quietly reduce proceeds on a trade. No admin mint function was found, meaning no mechanism was detected that would let the owner create new tokens and dilute existing holders. Transfers are not pausable and no address blacklist function was detected, so no mechanism was found that would let the owner freeze the contract or block specific wallets from moving tokens. The contract is also not an upgradeable proxy, meaning its logic cannot be swapped out for different code after deployment, at least not through that mechanism. The contract source is verified on the block explorer, which means the code is publicly readable and matches what is deployed, though this says nothing about whether that code behaves in the holders' interest. The one notable flag is extreme holder concentration: the top 10 wallets hold 97.8% of supply across only 112 holders. This does not indicate any specific contract function being misused, but it does mean a very small number of addresses could move a large share of supply at once, which is a structural risk independent of the code itself.

It's important to understand what this check does not cover. It reads contract mechanics only — it has no view into who the team behind PermawebDAO actually is, whether they are anonymous, their track record, how tokens were allocated or vested, what the liquidity situation looks like, or any legal or regulatory status of the project. Nothing here speaks to intent. A clean contract reading does not mean the people operating it have good or bad intentions, and this process does not involve any human review — it is fully automated and limited to what can be read from the code and chain data on the day of the check.

Before putting money in, it's worth checking who holds those top 10 wallets and whether any are known exchange, team, or liquidity-pool addresses rather than independent holders, since that materially changes what 97.8% concentration means in practice. It's also worth looking at whether liquidity is locked and for how long, checking the project's public presence and any team disclosures, and searching for independent discussion of the token outside of official channels. Re-running a check like this periodically is also sensible, since contract permissions and holder distribution can change over time even when the current snapshot shows no flags.

Team, tokenomics and legal structure are not assessed here — that is the other 82 points of the ChainSift Score. How this check works and what it misses.

Watch this contract

Contracts change after they are checked. Tell us where to reach you and we will say when this one does. Free for three contracts, no account.

We send one confirmation message and nothing else until something changes.

We checked 18 points out of 100.

The other 82 are where money is usually lost: who the team is, where the tokens sit, what the documents actually say, and what the project chose not to put on its front page.

Trading a meme coin? The meme coin check shows how much real money is in the pool and what you lose selling $1,000, who can pull that money out, who holds the supply and how it trades — ready within 3 minutes of payment, day or night.

Related guides

Contract data read from GoPlus Security and the BSC block explorer. Scores are calculated by fixed rules from that data — no language model decides them. Last updated 1 Nov 2026. A check describes a contract on the date shown; contracts can be changed afterwards.