SWARM On-Chain Risk Check

Swarm · BSC · 0x04fd77c2f97d044b3c719282fd0a0568f4254afa
13 / 18 On-chain Check
Checked 30 Oct 2026. On-chain Check, 18 of the 100-point ChainSift Score — what it covers.

Evidence

Risk factorFindingEvidenceDate
Sellable Yes Transfer simulation 30 Oct 2026
Buy tax 1% Contract 30 Oct 2026
Sell tax 2% Contract 30 Oct 2026
Admin mint Enabled Contract 30 Oct 2026
Transfers pausable Not present Contract 30 Oct 2026
Address blacklist Not present Contract 30 Oct 2026
Upgradeable proxy No Contract 30 Oct 2026
Source verified Yes Block explorer 30 Oct 2026
Top-10 holders 36.8% Holder distribution 30 Oct 2026
Liquidity locked 100% burned LP holders 30 Oct 2026
Holders 1178 Token contract 30 Oct 2026

This contract — SWARM

Deployed by0xaa2d3f…ac64a1
Current ownerNone — ownership renounced
Holders1,178

Largest holders

RankAddressShare
#1 · PancakeV2 · contract 0x933bfb…6967e2 21.91%
#2 0xe745e6…77fae2 3.46%
#3 0x052110…7a6744 2.65%
#4 0x499d5f…8c4cbc 1.61%
#5 0x7458ae…f3219c 1.59%

What this means

This automated check scanned the SWARM contract on BNB Chain and scored it 13 out of 18. On the date of the check, selling was possible in a transfer simulation, meaning no honeypot behaviour was detected — tokens bought can also be sold. A transfer tax of up to 2% applies, with buys taxed at 1% and sells at 2%, so a small portion of every trade is taken by the contract rather than reaching the recipient. More significantly, the contract owner retains the ability to mint new tokens at will, which means the circulating supply can be increased at any time without holder approval, potentially diluting the value of existing tokens. No pause function or address blacklist was found, meaning the owner does not appear able to freeze transfers or lock individual wallets out of trading, and the contract is not upgradeable, so its logic cannot be swapped out later via a proxy. The contract's source code is verified on the block explorer, which allows the underlying logic to be publicly inspected. Liquidity is reported as 100% burned, meaning the liquidity pool tokens have been sent to an irretrievable address, which reduces (but does not eliminate) the risk of the liquidity being pulled by whoever controls it.

It's important to understand what this check does not cover. It only reads contract mechanics — the code's capabilities, not the people behind it or their plans. It says nothing about who the team is, whether they are anonymous, how tokens are allocated or vested, whether there is a working product, what the token's actual utility or roadmap is, or whether any marketing claims made about it are accurate. Top-10 wallets holding 36.8% of supply is a concentration figure, not a judgement — it simply means a relatively small number of addresses could exert significant price influence if they chose to sell, but it doesn't tell you who those wallets belong to or their intentions. None of this is a legal, financial or intent assessment, and no human has reviewed this token — the entire result is generated automatically.

Before putting money into this or any token, consider looking up the project's own documentation and whether the team is publicly identifiable, checking whether the mint function has an on-chain cap, timelock or multisig requirement rather than being controlled by a single wallet, reviewing the holder list directly on the block explorer to see who the top wallets actually are and whether they're exchange or contract addresses, and searching for independent discussion of the project outside of its own channels. Contract mechanics are only one layer of risk — they don't substitute for research into the people and plans behind the token.

Team, tokenomics and legal structure are not assessed here — that is the other 82 points of the ChainSift Score. How this check works and what it misses.

Watch this contract

Contracts change after they are checked. Tell us where to reach you and we will say when this one does. Free for three contracts, no account.

We send one confirmation message and nothing else until something changes.

We checked 18 points out of 100.

The other 82 are where money is usually lost: who the team is, where the tokens sit, what the documents actually say, and what the project chose not to put on its front page.

Trading a meme coin? The meme coin check shows how much real money is in the pool and what you lose selling $1,000, who can pull that money out, who holds the supply and how it trades — ready within 3 minutes of payment, day or night.

Related guides

Contract data read from GoPlus Security and the BSC block explorer. Scores are calculated by fixed rules from that data — no language model decides them. Last updated 30 Oct 2026. A check describes a contract on the date shown; contracts can be changed afterwards.