| Risk factor | Finding | Evidence | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sellable | Yes | Transfer simulation | 13 Oct 2026 |
| Buy tax | 0% | Contract | 13 Oct 2026 |
| Sell tax | 0% | Contract | 13 Oct 2026 |
| Admin mint | Can never start | Doppler token code | 13 Oct 2026 |
| Transfers pausable | Not present | Contract | 13 Oct 2026 |
| Address blacklist | Not present | Contract | 13 Oct 2026 |
| Upgradeable proxy | No | Contract | 13 Oct 2026 |
| Source verified | Yes | Block explorer | 13 Oct 2026 |
| Top-10 holders | 27.2% | Holder distribution | 13 Oct 2026 |
| Liquidity locked | Launch pool, permanently | Doppler factory | 13 Oct 2026 |
| Holders | 7007 | Token contract | 13 Oct 2026 |
| Deployed by | 0x10f18a…a19a73 |
| Current owner | 0x660eaa…ba8d12 — Doppler Airlock contract, can’t change this token |
| Holders | 7,007 |
| Rank | Address | Share |
|---|---|---|
| #1 · Uniswap v4 pool · contract | 0x498581…652b2b | 5.37% |
| #2 | 0x7d0e09…61b262 | 5.06% |
| #3 | 0xff8ce9…0dae05 | 3.26% |
| #4 | 0xed49cd…47401e | 2.89% |
| #5 · contract | 0x1cd026…b8844e | 1.99% |
This automated check on Surplus (Surplus Intelligence), on Base, returned a score of 17 out of 18, based on contract mechanics observed on the date of the check. In practice, this means that a test transfer was able to sell the token without being blocked, and the buy and sell tax are both set to 0%, so no hidden fee was detected on trades at the time of checking. The contract code shows that minting new tokens can never be started, meaning the owner cannot create additional supply out of nothing and dilute holders that way. No function to pause transfers was found, and no address blacklist mechanism was found, which means the owner does not appear to hold the ability to freeze trading or block specific wallets from moving tokens. The contract is also not upgradeable, so its core rules cannot be swapped out after launch. Liquidity in the launch pool is recorded as permanently locked, which limits the ability to withdraw that liquidity and leave buyers unable to sell. The contract source is verified on the block explorer, meaning the published code can be read and cross-checked against what is actually deployed. Top-10 wallets hold 26.7% of supply across 7,008 holders, which is a moderate concentration figure worth noting rather than a red flag on its own.
It's important to understand what this check does not cover. It only reads contract-level mechanics — things like mint functions, pausability, blacklist logic, tax rates and liquidity locks. It does not assess the team behind the project, their identity, track record, or whether they have other ventures with different outcomes. It does not evaluate tokenomics design, vesting schedules, treasury wallets, or how circulating supply might change through means outside the contract itself. It cannot speak to legal structure, jurisdiction, or regulatory status, and it cannot determine intent — a contract can look clean on-chain while the people behind it still make decisions off-chain that affect holders.
Before putting money in, it's worth looking at who the top holders actually are and whether any are exchange or team wallets rather than independent buyers, checking whether the project has a public team, audit reports from a named third party, and an active, verifiable community or development history. Reviewing the liquidity lock contract directly, rather than relying solely on this summary, and checking for any admin or treasury wallet activity on the block explorer are also reasonable next steps. None of these findings should be read as a recommendation to buy, hold, or sell.
Contracts change after they are checked. Tell us where to reach you and we will say when this one does. Free for three contracts, no account.
We checked 18 points out of 100.
The other 82 are where money is usually lost: who the team is, where the tokens sit, what the documents actually say, and what the project chose not to put on its front page.