SLOP On-Chain Risk Check

Slop Cash · Base · 0xa5a3a7a1dec1a57e41a0cdd8c2129cfd7b46b592
5 / 10 On-chain Check
Checked 5 Nov 2026. On-chain Check, 10 of the 100-point ChainSift Score — what it covers. Contract function analysis was unavailable for this contract, so that signal is excluded from the total.

Before you buy: Liquidity is not locked. Who can pull it out, how much real money is in the pool, and what do you lose selling $1,000?

Evidence

Risk factorFindingEvidenceDate
Sellable Yes ChainSift simulation 5 Nov 2026
Buy tax 0% Contract 5 Nov 2026
Sell tax 0% Contract 5 Nov 2026
Admin mint No data Contract 5 Nov 2026
Transfers pausable No data Contract 5 Nov 2026
Address blacklist No data Contract 5 Nov 2026
Upgradeable proxy No data Contract 5 Nov 2026
Source verified No Block explorer 5 Nov 2026
Top-10 holders 33.6% Holder distribution 5 Nov 2026
Liquidity locked No LP holders 5 Nov 2026
Holders 12099 Token contract 5 Nov 2026

This contract — SLOP

Deployed by0xb31c22…99f8c8
Holders12,099

Largest holders

RankAddressShare
#1 0x565e4e…962e06 5.46%
#2 · UniswapV2 · contract 0x69249e…d70c31 5.21%
#3 0x32906e…351624 4.96%
#4 0xa9a03c…d5f913 3.46%
#5 0xf9c213…5df51f 3.07%

What this means

This automated check on SLOP (Slop Cash) on Base returned a score of 5 out of 10, and a few things are worth unpacking before that number means anything useful. An automated simulation found the token sellable, with buy and sell tax both at 0% — meaning no honeypot behaviour was detected on the date of this check, and a sale was not blocked in simulation. However, the contract's source code is not verified on the block explorer, which means the check could only read raw bytecode rather than human-readable logic. As a result, several important functions — including whether the contract owner can mint new tokens, pause transfers, blacklist addresses, or upgrade the contract to different logic entirely — returned no data. This is not the same as those risks being absent; it means they could not be confirmed either way. Separately, liquidity in the trading pool is not locked, so whoever controls that liquidity retains the ability to withdraw it from the pool, which would affect the ability to trade the token at a stable price. Holder concentration also shows the top 10 wallets holding 33.6% of total supply, meaning a small number of addresses could move a large share of tokens in a single action.

It's important to be clear about what this check does not cover. This is a purely automated read of contract mechanics as they existed on the date of the check — it says nothing about who is behind the project, how tokens are allocated or scheduled to unlock, what the stated use case or roadmap is, whether any legal entity stands behind it, or what the team's intentions are. No person has reviewed this contract or the project behind it, and a clean mechanical read does not speak to any of those dimensions.

Given the unverified source code and the missing data on mint, pause, blacklist and upgrade functions, a sensible next step is to look for the verified contract on the Base block explorer yourself, or wait until the project publishes verified source, before assuming those functions don't exist. It's also worth checking whether the liquidity pool address is publicly known and whether any lock or vesting commitment has been made elsewhere, since this check found none. Reviewing the wallets behind that 33.6% concentration — whether they're exchange addresses, team wallets, or unrelated holders — would add useful context. Finally, since sellability was based on a point-in-time simulation rather than a continuous guarantee, conditions can change if contract permissions are later exercised.

Team, tokenomics and legal structure are not assessed here — that is the other 90 points of the ChainSift Score. How this check works and what it misses.

Watch this contract

Contracts change after they are checked. Tell us where to reach you and we will say when this one does. Free for three contracts, no account.

We send one confirmation message and nothing else until something changes.

We checked 10 points out of 100.

The other 90 are where money is usually lost: who the team is, where the tokens sit, what the documents actually say, and what the project chose not to put on its front page.

Trading a meme coin? The meme coin check shows how much real money is in the pool and what you lose selling $1,000, who can pull that money out, who holds the supply and how it trades — ready within 3 minutes of payment, day or night.

Related guides

Contract data read from GoPlus Security and the Base block explorer. The trade simulation (a buy, then a sale an hour later) is run by ChainSift directly on Base — our data source returned none for this contract. Scores are calculated by fixed rules from that data — no language model decides them. Last updated 5 Nov 2026. A check describes a contract on the date shown; contracts can be changed afterwards.