| Risk factor | Finding | Evidence | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sellable | No — transfers blocked | ChainSift simulation | 27 Oct 2026 |
| Buy tax | 0% | Contract | 27 Oct 2026 |
| Sell tax | No data | Contract | 27 Oct 2026 |
| Admin mint | No data | Contract | 27 Oct 2026 |
| Transfers pausable | No data | Contract | 27 Oct 2026 |
| Address blacklist | No data | Contract | 27 Oct 2026 |
| Upgradeable proxy | No data | Contract | 27 Oct 2026 |
| Source verified | No | Block explorer | 27 Oct 2026 |
| Top-10 holders | 90.7% | Holder distribution | 27 Oct 2026 |
| Liquidity locked | No | LP holders | 27 Oct 2026 |
| Holders | 1744 | Token contract | 27 Oct 2026 |
| Deployed by | 0x7d5346…d82475 |
| Holders | 1,744 |
| Rank | Address | Share |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | 0xfd92f4…2a7eda | 13.70% |
| #2 | 0x3304e2…7b566a | 13.23% |
| #3 | 0xbaed38…e9439f | 13.14% |
| #4 | 0x0d0707…b492fe | 12.68% |
| #5 | 0x1985ea…b25c87 | 12.56% |
This automated check found that selling this token is currently blocked by the contract itself. In practice, this means an automated simulation tried to sell the token after buying it and the transaction did not go through. When a contract behaves this way, anyone holding the token may not be able to convert it back into other assets, regardless of price movement or market demand. This single finding is severe enough that the overall score is set to 0, since no other signal can offset a token that cannot be sold. Alongside this, the contract source code is not verified, meaning the publicly readable logic behind these behaviours isn't available for independent inspection — only the compiled bytecode exists on-chain, which limits what any automated tool, including this one, can confirm about hidden functions. Liquidity is also not locked, which means whoever controls the liquidity pool retains the ability to withdraw it at any time, and the top 10 wallets hold 90.7% of the total supply, indicating that a small number of addresses could materially affect price or supply conditions through their own actions alone.
It's important to be clear about what this check does not do. It reads contract mechanics and simulates basic transactions — it does not evaluate the team behind the project, the token's economic design, any legal structure, marketing claims, or stated intentions. No person has reviewed this contract; the result comes entirely from automated analysis performed on the date of the check. The absence of data in several fields above (sell tax, admin mint, pausability, blacklist, upgradeability) means that information was not available or not detected during this scan — it does not mean those risks are absent.
Given that selling is blocked, this is not a situation where a small test purchase would provide reassurance: funds placed into a token that cannot be sold remain in the token regardless of the amount. Readers who want to understand more before proceeding should look at the project's own communications about this contract, check whether the team has acknowledged or explained the unverified source code, and review the liquidity pool directly on a block explorer to see who controls it and whether that control has changed. Consulting independent, qualified financial or legal advice is also a reasonable step when evidence of this kind is present, particularly where a contract's basic mechanics cannot currently be confirmed as allowing holders to exit their position.
Contracts change after they are checked. Tell us where to reach you and we will say when this one does. Free for three contracts, no account.
We checked 18 points out of 100.
The other 82 are where money is usually lost: who the team is, where the tokens sit, what the documents actually say, and what the project chose not to put on its front page.