| Risk factor | Finding | Evidence | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sellable | Yes | Transfer simulation | 2 Oct 2026 |
| Buy tax | No data | Contract | 2 Oct 2026 |
| Sell tax | No data | Contract | 2 Oct 2026 |
| Admin mint | Enabled | Contract | 2 Oct 2026 |
| Transfers pausable | Not present | Contract | 2 Oct 2026 |
| Address blacklist | Not present | Contract | 2 Oct 2026 |
| Upgradeable proxy | No | Contract | 2 Oct 2026 |
| Source verified | Yes | Block explorer | 2 Oct 2026 |
| Top-10 holders | 66.4% | Holder distribution | 2 Oct 2026 |
| Liquidity locked | No | LP holders | 2 Oct 2026 |
| Holders | 754127 | Token contract | 2 Oct 2026 |
| Deployed by | 0xe83f92…4f2818 |
| Holders | 754,127 |
| Rank | Address | Share |
|---|---|---|
| #1 · contract | 0xebf418…67e6b4 | 49.82% |
| #2 | 0x62ebec…a90c0a | 1.94% |
| #3 | 0x6325aa…b0ad75 | 1.90% |
| #4 | 0x001aa0…ca212d | 1.89% |
| #5 | 0xeb22d6…9bfbc6 | 1.89% |
This automated check found four things worth translating into plain terms. First, the contract owner can mint new tokens at will, which means the total supply is not fixed and new tokens could be created and put into circulation, potentially affecting the value of tokens already held. Second, the top 10 wallet addresses hold 66.2% of the total supply, meaning a small number of holders could move large amounts of tokens at once, which can affect price if any of them sell. Third, the contract's source code is verified on the block explorer, which means the code behind the token is publicly readable and matches what's deployed on-chain — this allows for inspection but does not by itself indicate anything about how the code behaves. Fourth, liquidity is not locked, meaning whoever controls the liquidity pool tokens could withdraw the paired assets from the trading pool, which would affect the ability to buy or sell at expected prices. On the positive side, no transfer-pausing function, address blacklist, or upgradeable proxy pattern was detected on the date of this check, and a sell simulation completed without triggering honeypot-style blocking behaviour. Buy and sell tax data was not available from the contract at the time of checking.
It's important to understand what this check does not cover. This is an automated read of contract mechanics only — it looks at code functions, holder distribution, and liquidity status. It does not assess the team behind the project, their track record, their intentions, the token's economic design, roadmap, marketing claims, or any legal or regulatory standing. A contract can score well on mechanics while other risks entirely outside this check's scope remain unaddressed, and vice versa.
Before putting money into any token, it's worth independently verifying who controls the owner wallet and whether that control sits with a multisig, a DAO, or a single private key. Look into how liquidity is managed and by whom, check whether the project has published audits from independent security firms, and research the team's public history and communication. Reading the project's own documentation on tokenomics and mint policy, and checking community discussion for reported issues, are also reasonable next steps. None of the above should be read as investment advice or a judgement on whether this token is worth buying or selling.
Contracts change after they are checked. Tell us where to reach you and we will say when this one does. Free for three contracts, no account.
We checked 18 points out of 100.
The other 82 are where money is usually lost: who the team is, where the tokens sit, what the documents actually say, and what the project chose not to put on its front page.