| Risk factor | Finding | Evidence | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sellable | No — transfers blocked | ChainSift simulation | 23 Oct 2026 |
| Buy tax | 0% | Contract | 23 Oct 2026 |
| Sell tax | No data | Contract | 23 Oct 2026 |
| Admin mint | No data | Contract | 23 Oct 2026 |
| Transfers pausable | No data | Contract | 23 Oct 2026 |
| Address blacklist | No data | Contract | 23 Oct 2026 |
| Upgradeable proxy | No data | Contract | 23 Oct 2026 |
| Source verified | No | Block explorer | 23 Oct 2026 |
| Top-10 holders | 90% | Holder distribution | 23 Oct 2026 |
| Liquidity locked | No | LP holders | 23 Oct 2026 |
| Holders | 1751 | Token contract | 23 Oct 2026 |
| Deployed by | 0x190790…e444b4 |
| Holders | 1,751 |
| Rank | Address | Share |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | 0xfd92f4…2a7eda | 13.78% |
| #2 | 0x3304e2…7b566a | 13.19% |
| #3 | 0xbaed38…e9439f | 13.10% |
| #4 | 0x1985ea…b25c87 | 12.70% |
| #5 | 0x0d0707…b492fe | 12.70% |
This automated check scored KNNX (Konnex) 0 out of 18 on Base, and the central reason is the most serious one available: an automated simulation found that selling is blocked by the contract. In practice, this means wallets can buy the token but the contract's code prevents transactions that would let them sell it back out. Whatever other signals are present, this single finding caps the score at zero, because a token that cannot be sold cannot meaningfully be assessed for anything else. Alongside this, the contract's source code is not verified, so no one outside the deployer can read the actual logic — only raw bytecode is visible, meaning the mechanics behind buying, selling, minting or pausing cannot be independently confirmed. The top 10 wallets holding 90% of supply indicates that a small number of addresses could move or dump a large share of tokens at once, and liquidity is not locked, which means whoever controls the liquidity pool could withdraw it at any time, leaving remaining tokens without a trading market.
It's important to be clear about what this check does not cover. This is an automated read of contract mechanics only — it looks at code behaviour, holder distribution and liquidity status as they appeared on the date of the check. It says nothing about who is behind the project, their intentions, the token's broader economic design, marketing claims, roadmap, or any legal or regulatory status. No human reviewed this contract or the team behind it, and the absence of a flag elsewhere in the evidence table (such as "no data" on sell tax, admin mint, or blacklist functions) means that information was not available to check, not that those risks are absent.
Given that selling is currently blocked, no amount of money put into this token — including a small test purchase — would be retrievable if that condition holds. Before considering any action, it would be worth independently verifying the contract's source code directly on the block explorer, checking whether the project has published any official statement addressing why transfers appear restricted, and reviewing the liquidity pool directly to see who controls it and whether it can be withdrawn. Checking independent community discussion and any audit history, rather than relying on project-provided materials alone, is also a reasonable next step before forming a view.
Contracts change after they are checked. Tell us where to reach you and we will say when this one does. Free for three contracts, no account.
We checked 18 points out of 100.
The other 82 are where money is usually lost: who the team is, where the tokens sit, what the documents actually say, and what the project chose not to put on its front page.