| Risk factor | Finding | Evidence | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sellable | Yes | ChainSift simulation | 30 Oct 2026 |
| Buy tax | 0% | Contract | 30 Oct 2026 |
| Sell tax | 0% | Contract | 30 Oct 2026 |
| Admin mint | No data | Contract | 30 Oct 2026 |
| Transfers pausable | No data | Contract | 30 Oct 2026 |
| Address blacklist | No data | Contract | 30 Oct 2026 |
| Upgradeable proxy | No data | Contract | 30 Oct 2026 |
| Source verified | No | Block explorer | 30 Oct 2026 |
| Top-10 holders | 92.5% | Holder distribution | 30 Oct 2026 |
| Liquidity locked | No | LP holders | 30 Oct 2026 |
| Holders | 1721 | Token contract | 30 Oct 2026 |
| Deployed by | 0xa0d7aa…df90f7 |
| Holders | 1,721 |
| Rank | Address | Share |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | 0xfd92f4…2a7eda | 13.70% |
| #2 | 0x3304e2…7b566a | 13.17% |
| #3 | 0xbaed38…e9439f | 13.11% |
| #4 | 0x0d0707…b492fe | 12.68% |
| #5 | 0x1985ea…b25c87 | 12.60% |
This automated check gave TermMax (TRMX) a score of 0 out of 10 on the date it was run, and it's worth understanding exactly what that number is built from. The simulation found the token sellable, with a 0% buy tax and 0% sell tax detected — so no honeypot behaviour was identified at the time of the check. However, the contract's source code is not verified on the block explorer, which means the underlying logic exists only as bytecode. In practice, this means functions like minting new tokens, pausing transfers, blacklisting addresses, or upgrading the contract through a proxy could not be read or scored — not because they're absent, but because they're unknown. If any of those functions exist and are controlled by the contract owner, that owner could potentially create new supply, freeze a holder's tokens, or block specific wallets from transacting, without a holder having any way to see that coming. Separately, the top 10 wallets hold 92.5% of the total supply, and no liquidity lock was found — together these mean a small number of holders could sell in size, and that liquidity backing the token could be withdrawn, at any time, by whoever controls it.
It's important to be clear about what this check does not cover. This is an automated read of contract mechanics only — it does not assess who the team behind TermMax is, whether their stated plans or tokenomics are realistic, whether any legal entity stands behind the project, or what their intentions are. No human has reviewed this token, and a clean mechanical reading says nothing about the people running it.
Given the unverified source code and the concentration of supply, a reader considering this token would want to look at the contract directly on Base's block explorer and see whether the team has published or verified the code elsewhere. Checking whether the top wallets are exchange or team addresses, rather than independent holders, would also change the picture considerably. Looking for any liquidity lock proof directly on-chain, reviewing the project's own documentation and social channels for transparency about ownership and admin permissions, and searching for any independent audits are all reasonable next steps. None of this constitutes investment advice, and this summary does not suggest any course of action regarding buying or selling.
Contracts change after they are checked. Tell us where to reach you and we will say when this one does. Free for three contracts, no account.
We checked 10 points out of 100.
The other 90 are where money is usually lost: who the team is, where the tokens sit, what the documents actually say, and what the project chose not to put on its front page.
Trading a meme coin? The meme coin check shows how much real money is in the pool and what you lose selling $1,000, who can pull that money out, who holds the supply and how it trades — ready within 3 minutes of payment, day or night.