| Risk factor | Finding | Evidence | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sellable | Yes | Transfer simulation | 28 Oct 2026 |
| Buy tax | 0% | Contract | 28 Oct 2026 |
| Sell tax | 0% | Contract | 28 Oct 2026 |
| Admin mint | Enabled | Contract | 28 Oct 2026 |
| Transfers pausable | Not present | Contract | 28 Oct 2026 |
| Address blacklist | Not present | Contract | 28 Oct 2026 |
| Balances | Changeable — whoever controls the contract can take tokens from any wallet | Contract | 28 Oct 2026 |
| Upgradeable proxy | No | Contract | 28 Oct 2026 |
| Source verified | Yes | Block explorer | 28 Oct 2026 |
| Top-10 holders | 0% | Holder distribution | 28 Oct 2026 |
| Liquidity locked | 99.7%, end date unknown | LP holders · UNCX | 28 Oct 2026 |
| Holders | 10033 | Token contract | 28 Oct 2026 |
| Deployed by | 0x166f06…66d945 |
| Current owner | None — ownership renounced |
| Holders | 10,033 |
| Rank | Address | Share |
|---|---|---|
| #1 · contract | 0x3fa68c…21a41d | 0.00% |
| #2 · contract | 0x4c5160…b249fd | 0.00% |
| #3 | 0x244357…d5ae8c | 0.00% |
| #4 · contract | 0xcd8406…2e8339 | 0.00% |
| #5 | 0x5edb64…fb64c9 | 0.00% |
This automated check of MetaYield (MY) on Base returned 14 out of 18, with a few findings worth translating into plain terms. An automated simulation found the token can currently be sold, and both buy and sell tax are set to 0%, so no transfer fees were detected on the date of the check. However, two findings stand out: admin mint is enabled, meaning whoever controls the contract can create new MY tokens at will, which can dilute existing holders' share of supply without warning. More significantly, the contract allows balances to be changed directly — in practice, this means whoever controls the contract has the technical ability to alter or remove tokens from any wallet, including yours, independent of normal transfers. No transfer-pausing function or address blacklist was detected, and the contract is not an upgradeable proxy, so its core logic cannot be swapped out later. Source code is verified on the block explorer, which allows anyone to read what the contract actually does. Liquidity was found to be 99.7% locked at the time of the check, though the lock's end date could not be determined, and top-10 holders were found to control 0% of supply, with 10,033 holders recorded.
It's important to be clear about what this check does not cover. This is an automated read of the contract's mechanics only — it looks at code, permissions, and on-chain data. It does not assess who is behind the project, their track record, intentions, or whether marketing claims match reality. It does not evaluate tokenomics design, roadmap credibility, legal structure, or whether the team has undisclosed control through other wallets or contracts. A high score here reflects the absence of certain detected risks in the code, not an endorsement of the project or a judgement about the people running it.
Before putting money in, it's worth looking into who holds the admin keys — some projects publish multisig or timelock details that limit how mint and balance-change functions can actually be used. Check whether the liquidity lock has a defined end date by looking directly at the UNCX lock contract, since an unknown end date means locked liquidity could become unlockable at an unspecified future point. Look for any public team identity, audit reports from independent firms, and community discussion of how the mint and balance-change functions have been used historically, if at all. None of this guarantees an outcome, but it fills in the parts of the picture that contract mechanics alone cannot show.
Contracts change after they are checked. Tell us where to reach you and we will say when this one does. Free for three contracts, no account.
We checked 18 points out of 100.
The other 82 are where money is usually lost: who the team is, where the tokens sit, what the documents actually say, and what the project chose not to put on its front page.