| Risk factor | Finding | Evidence | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sellable | No — transfers blocked | ChainSift simulation | 5 Nov 2026 |
| Buy tax | 0% | Contract | 5 Nov 2026 |
| Sell tax | No data | Contract | 5 Nov 2026 |
| Admin mint | No data | Contract | 5 Nov 2026 |
| Transfers pausable | No data | Contract | 5 Nov 2026 |
| Address blacklist | No data | Contract | 5 Nov 2026 |
| Upgradeable proxy | No data | Contract | 5 Nov 2026 |
| Source verified | No | Block explorer | 5 Nov 2026 |
| Top-10 holders | 50.7% | Holder distribution | 5 Nov 2026 |
| Liquidity locked | No | LP holders | 5 Nov 2026 |
| Holders | 934 | Token contract | 5 Nov 2026 |
| Deployed by | 0xde16b9…0dac53 |
| Holders | 934 |
| Rank | Address | Share |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | 0x707b94…4dfca4 | 11.86% |
| #2 · contract | 0xfd7cc2…6c7003 | 10.47% |
| #3 | 0x39b8f6…3a08fb | 6.07% |
| #4 | 0xba0a0a…38c3e5 | 4.97% |
| #5 | 0xfd92f4…2a7eda | 3.00% |
This automated check gave 4D a score of 0 out of 18, and the main reason is the most serious one this tool can report: on the date of the check, selling the token was blocked by the contract. This pattern, often called a honeypot, means wallets can buy in but transactions attempting to sell back out fail. Practically, this means any funds used to buy this token could become stuck with no route back to another asset, regardless of how promising the project may look elsewhere. Alongside this, source code is not verified, so nobody outside the deployer can confirm what the bytecode actually does beyond what simulation revealed. The top 10 holders control 50.7% of supply, meaning a small number of wallets could move a large share of tokens at once, and liquidity is not locked, so whoever controls the liquidity pool could withdraw it at any time, leaving remaining tokens without a trading market. Several other mechanics — sell tax, admin mint ability, pausable transfers, blacklisting, upgradeability — returned no data, which means the automated check could not confirm their presence or absence, not that they are ruled out.
It's important to be clear about what this score does not cover. This is a mechanical read of contract code and on-chain data only, run automatically with no human review. It says nothing about who built the token, their intentions, their track record, the project's marketing claims, tokenomics design, roadmap, legal status, or whether any entity involved is registered or regulated anywhere. A low score reflects code-level risk indicators detected at a specific point in time; it is not a judgement on the people behind the project or on future conduct.
Given that selling is currently blocked, the usual advice to "try a small test buy" does not apply here: if the contract prevents sales, funds put in — however small — stay in. Instead, what's worth doing is treating the honeypot flag as current and checking whether it changes over time via repeated automated checks, reviewing the contract on a block explorer if you're able to, looking at whether liquidity gets locked later, and researching the team and community discussion independently through channels outside this tool. None of this constitutes financial advice, and nothing here should be read as a recommendation to buy, hold, or avoid this token.
Contracts change after they are checked. Tell us where to reach you and we will say when this one does. Free for three contracts, no account.
We checked 18 points out of 100.
The other 82 are where money is usually lost: who the team is, where the tokens sit, what the documents actually say, and what the project chose not to put on its front page.
Trading a meme coin? The meme coin check shows how much real money is in the pool and what you lose selling $1,000, who can pull that money out, who holds the supply and how it trades — ready within 3 minutes of payment, day or night.