send On-Chain Risk Check

Send Token · Base · 0x3f14920c99beb920afa163031c4e47a3e03b3e4a
12 / 18 On-chain Check
Checked 2 Nov 2026. On-chain Check, 18 of the 100-point ChainSift Score — what it covers.

Before you buy: Liquidity is not locked. Who can pull it out, how much real money is in the pool, and what do you lose selling $1,000?

Evidence

Risk factorFindingEvidenceDate
Sellable Yes Transfer simulation 2 Nov 2026
Buy tax 0% Contract 2 Nov 2026
Sell tax 0% Contract 2 Nov 2026
Admin mint Not present Contract 2 Nov 2026
Transfers pausable Not present Contract 2 Nov 2026
Address blacklist Not present Contract 2 Nov 2026
Upgradeable proxy No Contract 2 Nov 2026
Source verified Yes Block explorer 2 Nov 2026
Top-10 holders 99.3% Holder distribution 2 Nov 2026
Liquidity locked No LP holders 2 Nov 2026
Holders 6640 Token contract 2 Nov 2026

This contract — send

Deployed by0x647eb4…ee3f89
Current owner0x420000…000010
Holders6,640

Largest holders

RankAddressShare
#1 · contract 0x60e544…95f615 98.66%
#2 0x8e6be3…7ac9eb 0.12%
#3 · contract 0x4310d1…6f696e 0.10%
#4 · contract 0x1ba6b8…a8967d 0.09%
#5 · contract 0x598f2f…0a4349 0.07%

What this means

This automated check on Send Token (send), on Base, found no honeypot behaviour: a transfer simulation showed the token can be sold, and buy/sell tax are both set to 0% at the time of the check. No admin mint function was detected, meaning the contract owner does not appear able to create new tokens out of thin air and dilute holders. No pause function and no address blacklist were found, so the contract does not currently show a mechanism for the owner to freeze transfers or lock out specific wallets. The contract is also not upgradeable, meaning its logic cannot be swapped out later to introduce new restrictions. The contract source is verified on the block explorer, which means the code is readable and matches what's deployed — it does not by itself mean the code is safe. Two things stand out as higher risk: liquidity is not locked, so whoever controls the liquidity pool could withdraw it, and the top 10 holders control 99.3% of supply, which is a very high concentration — large sales by a small number of wallets could move the market significantly.

It's important to understand what this check does not cover. This is an automated read of contract mechanics only — it does not assess who is behind the project, their track record, their stated plans, or whether the token's economics are designed sustainably. No part of this process involved a human reviewing the project, its marketing, or its community. A clean mechanical scorecard and verified source code do not say anything about the people controlling the top wallets or the liquidity pool, and absence of a flag only means that specific behaviour was not detected on the day the check ran — contracts can change through external actions like liquidity withdrawal even when the code itself is static.

Before putting money in, it's worth looking at who holds the liquidity pool tokens and whether that liquidity is held by a multisig, a timelock, or a single unlocked wallet — unlocked liquidity controlled by one address is a materially different situation than liquidity locked by a third-party contract. It's also worth checking the wallets behind that 99.3% concentration: are they known team or exchange wallets, or anonymous addresses with no history? Looking at the project's public communications, any audit reports from a named third party, and the age and transaction history of the contract can also help build a fuller picture. None of this check's findings should be read as a recommendation to buy, hold, or avoid the token — it's a snapshot of contract behaviour, not a verdict on the project.

Team, tokenomics and legal structure are not assessed here — that is the other 82 points of the ChainSift Score. How this check works and what it misses.

Watch this contract

Contracts change after they are checked. Tell us where to reach you and we will say when this one does. Free for three contracts, no account.

We send one confirmation message and nothing else until something changes.

We checked 18 points out of 100.

The other 82 are where money is usually lost: who the team is, where the tokens sit, what the documents actually say, and what the project chose not to put on its front page.

Trading a meme coin? The meme coin check shows how much real money is in the pool and what you lose selling $1,000, who can pull that money out, who holds the supply and how it trades — ready within 3 minutes of payment, day or night.

Related guides

Contract data read from GoPlus Security and the Base block explorer. Scores are calculated by fixed rules from that data — no language model decides them. Last updated 2 Nov 2026. A check describes a contract on the date shown; contracts can be changed afterwards.