| Risk factor | Finding | Evidence | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sellable | No — transfers blocked | ChainSift simulation | 2 Nov 2026 |
| Buy tax | 0% | ChainSift simulation | 2 Nov 2026 |
| Sell tax | No data | Contract | 2 Nov 2026 |
| Admin mint | Enabled | Contract | 2 Nov 2026 |
| Transfers pausable | Not present | Contract | 2 Nov 2026 |
| Address blacklist | Not present | Contract | 2 Nov 2026 |
| Upgradeable proxy | No | Contract | 2 Nov 2026 |
| Source verified | Yes | Block explorer | 2 Nov 2026 |
| Top-10 holders | 93.1% | Holder distribution | 2 Nov 2026 |
| Holders | 28518 | Token contract | 2 Nov 2026 |
| Deployed by | 0xbae723…c38e96 |
| Holders | 28,518 |
| Rank | Address | Share |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | 0xbae723…c38e96 | 70.67% |
| #2 | 0x756f10…cbe040 | 22.27% |
| #3 | 0xf49919…79566c | 0.02% |
| #4 | 0xf94316…833bbc | 0.02% |
| #5 | 0x147f7f…cea4a2 | 0.02% |
This automated check scanned the MAGA (Trump Project 2025) contract on Base and found that selling is currently blocked by the contract code itself — this is what's known as honeypot behaviour. In practice, this means that although buying the token appears possible, the contract's logic prevents transfers out again, so tokens bought could not be sold at the time of this check. On top of this, the contract owner retains the ability to mint new tokens at will, which would let them increase the total supply and dilute existing holders' share whenever they choose. The check also found that the top 10 wallets hold 93.1% of the entire supply, meaning a very small number of addresses could move or dump a large portion of tokens, directly affecting whatever market there is for the token. The contract source code being verified on the block explorer is a positive signal for transparency, since it means the code is publicly readable, but verification alone says nothing about what that code allows the owner to do — in this case, it allows minting and appears to block selling. Because no tokens could be sold in this check, the result is scored 0 out of 18 regardless of any other findings.
It's important to be clear about what this check does not cover. This is an automated, mechanical read of the contract's code and on-chain data only — it does not assess the people behind the project, their intentions, the token's economic design, marketing claims, or any legal status. No human has reviewed this project, and nothing here speaks to whether the team is acting in good faith or whether the token has any real-world use case. A verified contract with a honeypot flag simply means the blocking behaviour is visible in the code, not that it is accidental or explained anywhere.
Given that selling is blocked, there is no safe way to "test" this token with a small purchase — any funds put into a contract that cannot be sold remain stuck there, regardless of the amount. Rather than attempting a purchase, next steps would involve independently researching the project's public communications, team identity (if disclosed), and community discussion for any mention of this selling restriction, checking whether the contract owner has published any explanation or roadmap for the mint function, and looking at how the token is being promoted relative to what the contract actually permits. Cross-referencing this contract address on other independent block explorers and honeypot-detection tools may also help confirm these findings before drawing any further conclusions.
Contracts change after they are checked. Tell us where to reach you and we will say when this one does. Free for three contracts, no account.
We checked 18 points out of 100.
The other 82 are where money is usually lost: who the team is, where the tokens sit, what the documents actually say, and what the project chose not to put on its front page.
Trading a meme coin? The meme coin check shows how much real money is in the pool and what you lose selling $1,000, who can pull that money out, who holds the supply and how it trades — ready within 3 minutes of payment, day or night.