| Risk factor | Finding | Evidence | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sellable | Yes | Transfer simulation | 6 Oct 2026 |
| Buy tax | No data | Contract | 6 Oct 2026 |
| Sell tax | No data | Contract | 6 Oct 2026 |
| Admin mint | Not present | Contract | 6 Oct 2026 |
| Transfers pausable | Not present | Contract | 6 Oct 2026 |
| Address blacklist | Not present | Contract | 6 Oct 2026 |
| Upgradeable proxy | No | Contract | 6 Oct 2026 |
| Source verified | Yes | Block explorer | 6 Oct 2026 |
| Top-10 holders | 63.6% | Holder distribution | 6 Oct 2026 |
| Liquidity locked | Launch pool, permanently | Doppler factory | 6 Oct 2026 |
| Holders | 946 | Token contract | 6 Oct 2026 |
| Deployed by | 0xde1fd8…ee2fa6 |
| Current owner | 0x660eaa…ba8d12 — Doppler Airlock contract, can’t change this token |
| Holders | 946 |
| Rank | Address | Share |
|---|---|---|
| #1 · Uniswap v4 pool · contract | 0x498581…652b2b | 40.41% |
| #2 | 0xddbcdf…a99d96 | 3.96% |
| #3 | 0x64e74f…b9e65e | 3.71% |
| #4 | 0xde1fd8…ee2fa6 | 2.97% |
| #5 | 0x6ffccf…9f970a | 2.55% |
This automated check of the SPIKE (Brian's Iguana) contract on Base found no honeypot behaviour at the time of the scan: a transfer simulation showed the token can be sold, and no admin mint function, transfer-pausing mechanism, blacklist function, or upgradeable proxy pattern was detected in the contract code. In practice, this means the contract owner was not found to have the ability to mint new tokens to dilute holders, freeze transfers, block specific wallets from trading, or swap out the contract's logic after deployment. The contract source code is verified on the block explorer, which allows the underlying code to be read and checked by anyone, and the launch pool's liquidity is recorded as permanently locked via the Doppler factory, meaning that pool is not flagged as withdrawable by a single party on demand. One point of note: buy and sell tax data could not be retrieved from the contract at the time of this check, so any transaction fees built into trades are unconfirmed. Separately, the top 10 holders currently control 63.6% of supply, a concentration level that means a small number of wallets could have an outsized effect on price if they were to sell.
It's important to understand what this check does not cover. This is an automated read of contract mechanics only — it does not assess who is behind the project, whether the team has a history in other tokens, how the token's supply and incentives are structured long-term, whether any legal or regulatory structure exists around it, or the intent behind its launch. A clean mechanical scan does not speak to any of these, and no human has reviewed this token or its promotional claims as part of this process.
Before considering any transaction, it would be worth independently verifying the liquidity lock yourself through the Doppler factory contract or a lock-checking tool, rather than relying solely on this summary. Looking at the distribution of the top 10 wallets individually — rather than just the aggregate percentage — can also help you judge whether concentration sits with a few early buyers, a team allocation, or an exchange-related address. Checking for buy/sell tax directly through a small test transaction, reviewing the project's public communications and any team disclosures, and searching for independent discussion of the token outside of its own channels are all reasonable next steps. None of the findings above should be read as a recommendation to buy, hold, or avoid this token.
Contracts change after they are checked. Tell us where to reach you and we will say when this one does. Free for three contracts, no account.
We checked 18 points out of 100.
The other 82 are where money is usually lost: who the team is, where the tokens sit, what the documents actually say, and what the project chose not to put on its front page.