| Risk factor | Finding | Evidence | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sellable | No — transfers blocked | ChainSift simulation | 3 Nov 2026 |
| Buy tax | 0% | ChainSift simulation | 3 Nov 2026 |
| Sell tax | No data | Contract | 3 Nov 2026 |
| Admin mint | Not present | Contract | 3 Nov 2026 |
| Transfers pausable | Not present | Contract | 3 Nov 2026 |
| Address blacklist | Not present | Contract | 3 Nov 2026 |
| Upgradeable proxy | No | Contract | 3 Nov 2026 |
| Source verified | Yes | Block explorer | 3 Nov 2026 |
| Top-10 holders | 43.5% | Holder distribution | 3 Nov 2026 |
| Holders | 27066 | Token contract | 3 Nov 2026 |
| Deployed by | 0x13d508…414888 |
| Holders | 27,066 |
| Rank | Address | Share |
|---|---|---|
| #1 · contract | 0x7bf71a…48c50f | 21.52% |
| #2 | 0x13d508…414888 | 19.88% |
| #3 | 0x5318f4…328aa6 | 0.33% |
| #4 | 0x520067…9837f1 | 0.28% |
| #5 | 0x25ebaa…b20cbf | 0.26% |
This automated check simulated a sale of AIRENA on Arbitrum and found that selling is currently blocked by the contract. In practical terms, this means that even though buying the token appears possible, the contract's code (or configuration) prevents holders from converting it back out. This is commonly referred to as honeypot behaviour, and it is the most serious finding this check can return. The other data points — no admin mint function, no transfer-pausing mechanism, no address blacklist, no upgradeable proxy — describe capabilities the owner does not appear to hold, but because selling itself is blocked, none of that changes the practical outcome for a holder: funds put into this token cannot currently be taken back out. Top-10 wallets hold 43.5% of supply, which is a concentration level worth noting on its own, but it is secondary to the sell-blocking finding here.
It's worth being clear about what this check does not cover. This is an automated read of the contract's mechanics only — it simulates transactions and inspects code patterns, nothing more. It does not assess who is behind the project, whether the team has a history, what the token's actual use case or supply schedule is, whether there's a legal entity attached, or what the people deploying it intend to do next. A contract can show no mint function or no blacklist and still be part of a project with no real activity, no roadmap being followed, or misleading claims elsewhere. None of that is visible from contract code alone, and nothing here should be read as a comment on intent.
Given that selling is blocked, there is no safe way to "test" this with a small purchase — if transfers out are genuinely restricted, any amount sent in stays in. Rather than attempting a transaction, the next step is to look for independent confirmation of this finding: check whether other on-chain scanners or honeypot detectors report the same result, search for recent transactions from other wallets to see if anyone has successfully sold, and look at the contract's actual code on the block explorer (it is marked as verified, so this is possible) for functions that restrict transfers, such as conditional logic tied to specific addresses or trading toggles. It's also worth checking community channels or forums for other holders reporting the same inability to sell. Holder concentration and distribution figures can be cross-referenced against the explorer directly for anything that's changed since this check was run.
Contracts change after they are checked. Tell us where to reach you and we will say when this one does. Free for three contracts, no account.
We checked 18 points out of 100.
The other 82 are where money is usually lost: who the team is, where the tokens sit, what the documents actually say, and what the project chose not to put on its front page.
Trading a meme coin? The meme coin check shows how much real money is in the pool and what you lose selling $1,000, who can pull that money out, who holds the supply and how it trades — ready within 3 minutes of payment, day or night.