| Risk factor | Finding | Evidence | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sellable | No — transfers blocked | ChainSift simulation | 1 Nov 2026 |
| Buy tax | 0% | Contract | 1 Nov 2026 |
| Sell tax | No data | Contract | 1 Nov 2026 |
| Admin mint | No data | Contract | 1 Nov 2026 |
| Transfers pausable | No data | Contract | 1 Nov 2026 |
| Address blacklist | No data | Contract | 1 Nov 2026 |
| Upgradeable proxy | No data | Contract | 1 Nov 2026 |
| Source verified | No | Block explorer | 1 Nov 2026 |
| Top-10 holders | 83.3% | Holder distribution | 1 Nov 2026 |
| Liquidity locked | No | LP holders | 1 Nov 2026 |
| Holders | 2129 | Token contract | 1 Nov 2026 |
| Deployed by | 0xd14753…7757f1 |
| Holders | 2,129 |
| Rank | Address | Share |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | 0x5c2fbd…125edd | 15.91% |
| #2 | 0xcb6602…33e391 | 11.25% |
| #3 | 0xb38e8c…82891d | 10.00% |
| #4 | 0x0d0707…b492fe | 10.00% |
| #5 | 0xd14753…7757f1 | 8.47% |
This automated check found that EUEAI's contract on Arbitrum blocks selling — an automated simulation attempted to sell the token and the transaction did not go through. In practical terms, this means that if tokens are bought, the contract currently prevents converting them back out, regardless of price movement or market conditions. Because this behaviour was detected, the overall score is capped at 0 out of 18, since no other finding can offset a token that cannot be resold. Alongside this, the contract's source code is not verified on the block explorer, meaning only raw bytecode is available for review — nobody outside the deployer can easily confirm what the code actually does beyond what automated tools can infer. Liquidity is also not locked, which means whoever controls the liquidity pool retains the ability to withdraw it at any time, separate from the selling restriction already identified. The top 10 holders control 83.3% of the supply, so a small number of wallets hold the large majority of tokens in circulation.
It's worth being clear about what this check does not cover. This is an automated read of contract mechanics only — it looks at code behaviour, tax settings, holder distribution and liquidity status at the time of the check. It says nothing about who is behind the project, what their intentions are, whether any roadmap or marketing claims are accurate, or how the token is structured economically beyond what's visible on-chain. No human has reviewed this project, and absence of a flag elsewhere in the report means it was not detected on the date of the check, not that it has been ruled out.
Given that selling is currently blocked by the contract, no amount of money put into this token — including a small test purchase — would be retrievable if that restriction holds. There is no safe way to "test" a honeypot with real funds. Anyone wanting to understand this token further, for research purposes rather than as a basis for transacting, could look at whether the contract gets verified in future, whether liquidity becomes locked, and whether the sell restriction is ever lifted and independently reconfirmed. Checking the deployer wallet's history and whether similar contracts have been deployed before may also provide useful context, as can reviewing discussion of this token on independent forums rather than the project's own channels.
Contracts change after they are checked. Tell us where to reach you and we will say when this one does. Free for three contracts, no account.
We checked 18 points out of 100.
The other 82 are where money is usually lost: who the team is, where the tokens sit, what the documents actually say, and what the project chose not to put on its front page.
Trading a meme coin? The meme coin check shows how much real money is in the pool and what you lose selling $1,000, who can pull that money out, who holds the supply and how it trades — ready within 3 minutes of payment, day or night.