| Risk factor | Finding | Evidence | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sellable | No — transfers blocked | ChainSift simulation | 4 Nov 2026 |
| Buy tax | 0% | ChainSift simulation | 4 Nov 2026 |
| Sell tax | No data | Contract | 4 Nov 2026 |
| Admin mint | No data | Contract | 4 Nov 2026 |
| Transfers pausable | No data | Contract | 4 Nov 2026 |
| Address blacklist | No data | Contract | 4 Nov 2026 |
| Upgradeable proxy | No data | Contract | 4 Nov 2026 |
| Source verified | No | Block explorer | 4 Nov 2026 |
| Top-10 holders | 93.2% | Holder distribution | 4 Nov 2026 |
| Liquidity locked | No | LP holders | 4 Nov 2026 |
| Holders | 418 | Token contract | 4 Nov 2026 |
| Deployed by | 0xa4d1fe…eee94a |
| Holders | 418 |
| Rank | Address | Share |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | 0x3931da…4cc857 | 20.00% |
| #2 | 0x0938c6…a4589e | 20.00% |
| #3 | 0xe68ee8…83f2b9 | 10.00% |
| #4 | 0x1ab497…8f8f23 | 10.00% |
| #5 | 0x0d0707…b492fe | 10.00% |
This automated check simulated a sale of LUX on Arbitrum and found that selling is blocked by the contract: wallets that hold this token were not able to convert it back out in the simulation. This is the single most important finding here, because it means that whatever else is true about the project, funds put into this token could become stuck with no route back out. The other findings compound the picture: the top 10 holders control 93.2% of the supply, meaning a small number of wallets could move or dump a large share of tokens if their own transfers are not restricted, and the contract source code is not verified, so the actual rules governing minting, pausing, blacklisting, or upgrading cannot be read or confirmed from outside — these mechanics are simply unknown rather than ruled out. Liquidity is also not locked, which means whoever controls the liquidity pool could withdraw it at any time, further affecting the ability to trade the token. Because selling was blocked in simulation, this check scores the token 0 out of 18 regardless of any other result, since an unsellable token carries risk that outweighs other signals.
It's worth being clear about what this check does not cover. This is an automated read of contract code and on-chain data only — it does not know who the team behind Luxor is, whether they have a track record, what the token is meant to be used for, how supply is distributed in practice beyond wallet counts, or whether any legal structure or registration exists. No person has reviewed this project, and nothing here speaks to intent: a flag can reflect a technical design choice as easily as it can reflect deliberate misuse. Absence of data in a row (such as "No data" for sell tax, admin mint, or blacklist functions) means that information was not retrievable at the time of the check, not that the risk is absent.
Given that selling is currently blocked, no test purchase, however small, can safely confirm whether that will change — tokens already sent into a contract with this behaviour may not be recoverable. Anyone wanting to understand this project further would need to look elsewhere: searching the contract address and project name for independent commentary, checking whether the team is publicly identified anywhere, looking at the liquidity pool directly on a block explorer to see who can withdraw it, and treating unverified source code as an open question rather than a cleared one. Re-running this check at a later date may surface different results if the contract or liquidity conditions change.
Contracts change after they are checked. Tell us where to reach you and we will say when this one does. Free for three contracts, no account.
We checked 18 points out of 100.
The other 82 are where money is usually lost: who the team is, where the tokens sit, what the documents actually say, and what the project chose not to put on its front page.
Trading a meme coin? The meme coin check shows how much real money is in the pool and what you lose selling $1,000, who can pull that money out, who holds the supply and how it trades — ready within 3 minutes of payment, day or night.